Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Ag Today Tuesday, February 18, 2014


Obama promises money for drought relief; now the hard part begins [Modesto Bee]
The easiest part of the Obama administration’s response to the California drought is now over. The White House has provided money, commitments and a presidential visit. But the money is limited, the president is moving on and the commitments will soon be tested on Capitol Hill and deep within the federal bureaucracies….Abiding by Politics 101, President Barack Obama brought to the San Joaquin Valley on Friday what pros call “deliverables.” He announced new aid, including conservation grants, livestock producer assistance and funds for water-short rural communities. He pledged flexibility in federal water management decisions to maximize deliveries to farmers. He put his prestige on the line, a definite signal to administration underlings. The coming weeks and months will test the administration’s staying power on multiple California drought fronts.

Flood irrigation still common, but drip method is gaining ground [Sacramento Bee]
Amid one of the worst droughts in state history, environmental advocates say farms are where the big gains in water conservation will come from, not in the residential and commercial sectors….Broader adoption of solutions such as drip irrigation on farms, they say, could go a long way to stretch the state’s water supplies….California farmers have actually made big progress over the past 20 years in switching crops to drip irrigation. In 1991, when California was experiencing its last major drought, 70 percent of farms were irrigated by gravity flow and only 15 percent by “low volume” methods, which include pressurized drip irrigation, according to the DWR data. By 2010, low volume methods had more than doubled to 38 percent.

California faces critical drought, despite recent rains [Sacramento Bee]
A severe drought persists in California despite the recent precipitation, and parts of the state will face critical water shortages later this year without more rain and snowfall, water experts said at a Friday symposium….Statewide, the drought continues to hurt farmers. They’ll let at least 500,000 acres sit fallow this year due to lack of water, said Mike Wade, executive director of the California Farm Water Coalition. “It isn’t an issue of greed,” he said. “It’s an issue of survivability at this point.” In addition, “the livestock industry is reeling,” said Rich Matteis, administrator of the California Farm Bureau Federation. “Folks are selling off their herds.”

Drought: Mendocino County agricultural community worried [Ukiah Daily Journal]
Drought conditions that some are calling the worst California has seen in decades have local farmers worried about crop loss, according to officials….Water rights are ordered under state law so that users of any kind holding "senior" water rights get what they are entitled to, when, in a drought year like this one, junior water right holders will likely get nothing, according to White….Hamburg noted the state Water Resources Control Board has "the hammer" and notified water right holders they may need to "limit or stop divergence of water" if the drought persists, even though they have the right to do so. Devon Jones of the Mendocino County Farm Bureau said local growers are aware of the state's "hammer," and many had given up their crops so their neighbors will have enough water to supply their homes.

Officials discuss Valley’s place in state’s drought [Imperial Valley Press]
The Colorado snowpack is about average this year. Yet, “an average year doesn’t cancel the effects of a 14-year drought cycle,” said Tina Shields, Imperial Irrigation District Colorado River resources manager. Southern California water agencies will likely forego Northern California water sources in favor of the Colorado River, Shields said.
While this may not translate to into added political pressure on IID, as many in Imperial County fear, it will put more pressure on the Colorado River system….However, anxiety about water security continues to haunt rural Imperial Valley. The region is mostly agricultural, and the Quantification Settlement Agreement is still a sore point. “One of our biggest fears is once water is sold or taken away, it is difficult to get back,” said Linsey Dale, executive director of Imperial County Farm Bureau.

Petaluma slaughterhouse closure a ‘double whammy’ for Marin ranchers [Marin Independent Journal]
West Marin ranchers already reeling from the effects of the drought have a new burden: one of the largest meat processors in the North Bay has temporarily ceased operations while recalling a year's worth of processed beef and is under investigation by two offices in the U.S. Department of Agriculture. There are no reports of anyone becoming ill after eating the beef, and Supervisor Steve Kinsey has written a letter expressing "strong support" for Petaluma-based Rancho Feeding Corp., calling it an asset to Marin…."It (the closure) has had a significant impact," said Kinsey aide Liza Crosse. "If our ranchers can't use Rancho, then they are hauling the animals way farther, which is bad for the animals and involves significant costs for the ranchers," Crosse said. Other locations for processing include sites as distant at Modesto.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment