Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Ag Today Thursday, February 13, 2014


Delta tunnel plan cost hammered at hearing [Sacramento Bee]
Pointing to cost overruns with California’s high-speed rail project, lawmakers on Wednesday pressed state officials on the funding sources and ultimate price tag for the governor’s water tunnel plan. “I’m very concerned about the ever-expanding cost,” Assemblyman Jim Frazier, D-Oakley, said at the hearing’s outset. Frazier referred to an article in the San Jose Mercury News that puts the project’s cost over 50 years at over $50 billion – more than double the state’s figure of $24.7 billion – and added that “I tend to believe the higher number is probably the more accurate number.”

Recent rain a small relief to Sonoma County ranchers [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
For the first time in more than a year, the hills and pastures of Sonoma County are sporting a faint haze of green. “We asked for it; we got it,” said Santa Rosa rancher Doug Beretta, contemplating the astonishing fact that his fields have gone from tarmac-hard bare dirt to boot-sucking mud lakes in less than a week.…The rain didn't do as much for city folk. Water managers were quick to say that even such a monster rain fell far short of refilling the reservoirs that supply North Coast cities from Santa Rosa south to San Rafael. “It was not a drought buster,” Sonoma County Water Agency spokesman Brad Sherwood said. For the area's agricultural community, however, the soaking was met with a cautious cheer. “It was a miracle rain for the North Coast,” Sonoma County Farm Bureau Executive Director Tim Tesconi said.

Genetically engineered crops in nearly 12% of fields [USA Today]
Even as some U.S. consumers reject foods containing ingredients from genetically modified plants, farmers continue to embrace the technology. In 2013, crops grown from seed engineered to withstand weed killers, kill pests or resist diseases made up 11.7% of fields planted worldwide, a report released Thursday says. Last year, farmers planted 12 million more acres of plants genetically engineered to be herbicide tolerant, pest resistant or able to stand up to diseases than in 2012, said Clive James, with the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications. The non-profit tracks biotech crops and is based at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y. The United States leads the world in genetically modified (GM) plantings. Commodity crops genetically engineered to be herbicide tolerant or pest resistant are the norm in U.S. fields.

Opinion: Solving California’s reckless water policy [Sacramento Bee]
It appears that Washington has awakened to the current water woes of the West Coast. Late last week, the White House announced that President Barack Obama will visit Fresno on Friday to review and discuss federal relief efforts in response to the drought. Prior to that, the president had called Gov. Jerry Brown to express his support for our state and had mentioned to Rep. Kevin McCarthy at the State of the Union address that he had his eye on the issue. This drought has national significance; an outsized percentage of the nation’s food supply is grown in California, which is the nation’s No. 1 producer of fruits, vegetables and nuts. But having an “eye on the problem” is not a solution in and of itself. And unless the president can mandate rain or snow to fall from the heavens, we still will be faced with the driest year in more than a century.

Editorial: Welcome, President Obama; help us solve the problem [Merced Sun-Star]
As President Barack Obama prepares for his visit to Fresno on Friday, we can’t help but be reminded of another presidential visit 52 years ago. President John F. Kennedy came in 1962 to celebrate the groundbreaking for the San Luis Reservoir, which was built to hold 2 million acre-feet of irrigation water but has just 603,000 as of Wednesday – about half of what it held this time last year. Kennedy’s visit lasted two days and was a cause for celebration. President Obama’s visit will be to look at a disaster in the making. And we wonder how much of this disaster is political. Considering the gridlock and animosity in Washington, we wonder if our nation is even capable of envisioning projects as large as the San Luis Reservoir? Projects that could do so much good. What should be clear is the desperate need for additional water. We hope the president understands that we can’t provide more water in dry years unless we have places to store water in wet years.

Op-Ed: Don't give up on the bullet train, California [Los Angeles Times]
High-speed rail can succeed, but the state needs to backtrack from several mistakes, many of which were also made by its international predecessors. Who doesn't love a train? Who cannot fail to be seduced by the most appealing vehicle in human history — the rail-induced sensuality of "Brief Encounter," the desperate heroism of engineer Casey Jones, the creative muscle of the Big Four railroad barons, the plucky fortitude of Thomas the Tank Engine and the Little Engine That Could, all wrapped up in gleaming, rocking steel, punctuated by a high, lonesome whistle?...The reality has proved more problematic. The California High-Speed Rail Authority stumbled first by promising a smooth construction schedule and a $32-billion price tag. The ensuing lawsuits and engineering revisions have fouled up the timeline and bumped up the price to the current reckoning of $67.6 billion (and it'll probably be more expensive than that). The rail authority's latest business plan assumes ever more riders and ever less revenue but still suggests the project will ultimately be self-sustaining. Unfortunately, surveys demonstrate that voters are at best skeptical. Up to 59% in a late 2012 USC Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll said they would turn down high-speed rail, given the chance at a redo.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment