Feds to Central Valley farmers: Expect no water this summer [Fresno Bee]
The
federal Central Valley Project on Friday made an unprecedented irrigation
forecast -- zero water this summer for 3 million acres in the Central Valley at
the heart of the state's $44 billion farm industry. Federal leaders blamed a
record-setting drought for the potentially devastating cutback. San Joaquin
Valley farm officials say the industry could lose hundreds of millions of
dollars and jobless rates in some rural communities could soar above 50%....In
Fresno County, the country's biggest farm county with more than $6.5 billion
annually in products, the announcement hits hard, said Ryan Jacobsen, executive
director of the Fresno County Farm Bureau….If several storms hit California in
the next two months, water could become available for delivery, federal leaders
said….Farmer Dan Errotabere, a member of the Westlands board, said he will run
his wells aggressively to keep his crops alive, though he does not like to
overpump the groundwater. "We're going to fallow acreage," he said.
"But we still will have to overpump. We don't like to tax the water system
out here like that. You wind up losing wells." On the Valley's east side,
15,000 farmers are facing their first summer without San Joaquin River water
since Friant Dam was constructed and formed Millerton Lake more than 60 years
ago. Entire orchards may be lost in the east-side citrus region.
Opinion: Water won't run through lines in the sand [Salinas
Californian]
To
butcher an old adage, if you want to muck things up, form a committee —
particularly one where the members don’t get along. While farmers in the
Salinas Valley are increasingly worried about future irrigation water, the
federal Bureau of Reclamation told farmers in the Central Valley on Friday that
they will have a zero allocation of water from the Central Valley Water
Project.…I wish I could be as eloquent as California Farm Bureau Federation
President Paul Wenger was on Friday when he crafted the words to accompany my
sigh. “Make no mistake, our current water crisis is not caused by two years of
below normal rainfall, followed by the record dry year we’re having right now,”
Wenger said. “This crisis is the direct result of 20-plus years of inaction by
politicians and policymakers, who have failed to take the steps required to
shield California from drought.”
Opinion: California politicians have talked about water, but
done little [Sacramento Bee]
It’s
not that California politicians haven’t talked about the state’s uncertain
water supply. They have – constantly, for decades. It’s that they haven’t done
much but talk….However, they didn’t. The state hasn’t truly addressed its water
needs since Brown’s father, Pat Brown, was governor more than a half-century
ago….Just as we need state budget reserves to cushion the impact of economic
gyrations, so do we need more storage above or below ground to cope with the
ebb and flow of rain and snowfall, as well as more intelligent supply
management and a more rational pricing structure.
Environmentalists'
warning irks grape growers [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
North
Coast grape growers are weeks away from having to make crucial decisions about
how much water to use for frost protection, but already are facing what is
widely interpreted as a threat of being sued by environmental groups over
potential harm to fish habitats. Three Sonoma County organizations, including
one with a long history of filing lawsuits, sent letters to hundreds of growers
and vineyard managers in Sonoma and Mendocino counties outlining concerns about
water draw-downs harming federally protected salmon and steelhead. The
four-page letter notes that many vineyard managers are “working diligently” to
prevent extinction of fish species. But it also addresses concerns about
placing “profit above compliance with the law” and states growers who are
“known” to violate federal law will be publicly identified on the website for
California River Watch, or sued by the organization.
Eggman refocuses on
saving farmland [Stockton Record]
A
year ago this month, Assemblywoman Susan Eggman, D-Stockton, was still settling
into her seat in the Legislature. She had just been named chairwoman of the
Assembly Agriculture Committee and had introduced a farmland-preservation bill,
AB823, hoping it would force a minimum mitigation standard for urban
development projects statewide.…The bill quickly made it onto the California
Chamber of Commerce's annual "job killer" list. Opposition mounted.
Last month, AB823 died in Eggman's committee, but the former Stockton city
councilwoman has come up with a new approach. This week, she introduced AB1961,
which also is intended to preserve agriculture….There are major differences in
the two bills.
National Beef
proceeding with plant closure [Imperial Valley Press]
Three
weeks of discussions, meetings and fervent hope are over. National Beef will
close its Brawley meatpacking facility despite local officials’ efforts to
convince the company to stay. National Beef’s announcement at the end of
January that it would close its Brawley plant shocked the community and
prompted a quick response….According to National Beef, a decline of fed cattle
available for the Brawley plant was a key driver in its decision to close the
plant. Local officials say the company had three issues: cattle supply, utility
costs and regulatory compliance….National Beef released a statement around the
same time. “We have considered all of the alternatives, but, unfortunately, the
barriers to profitably operate the facility continue to exist. Even with the
proposed incentive package, the declining supply of fed cattle available for
the Brawley facility remains the key driver of our decision to close the
plant,” reads the press release.
Ag
Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm
Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may
not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site
registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more
information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment