Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Ag Today Monday, January 28, 2013




Senators offer a bipartisan blueprint for immigration [New York Times]
A bipartisan group of senators has agreed on a set of principles for a sweeping overhaul of the immigration system, including a pathway to American citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants that would hinge on progress in securing the borders and ensuring that foreigners leave the country when their visas expire.…Their blueprint, set to be unveiled on Monday, will allow them to stake out their position one day before President Obama outlines his immigration proposals in a speech on Tuesday in Las Vegas, in the opening moves of what lawmakers expect will be a protracted and contentious debate in Congress this year….Under the senators’ plan, most illegal immigrants would be able to apply to become permanent residents — a crucial first step toward citizenship — but only after certain border enforcement measures had been accomplished….Immigrant farmworkers would also be given a separate and faster path to citizenship, according to the principles.

EcoFarm Conference: California ag official says state lacks political influence [Monterey County Herald]
A top official in the state Department of Food and Agriculture, speaking at the EcoFarm Conference in Pacific Grove on Friday, said California was at a disadvantage in Congress and growers need to stop arguing with each other. Undersecretary Sandy Schubert spoke to a crowd of about 100 people at Asilomar Conference Grounds as part of a panel to discuss using government allies to help growers. "I can tell you, California ag does not stand together," she said. " ...When you're sitting there and you're a senator or a representative and you've got 20 (agriculture) groups coming in and beating up on each other and arguing about everything, it makes you less effective."…Many in the audience expressed frustration that the most recent federal Farm Bill has not passed.…If it had passed, much of the funding set aside for organic and specialty crops would have greatly benefited California more than other states. Schubert said the state has limited influence in getting laws passed, despite producing half of the country's produce, because other states are jealous.

California still hasn't bought land for bullet train route [Los Angeles Times]
Construction of California's high-speed rail network is supposed to start in just six months, but the state hasn't acquired a single acre along the route and faces what officials are calling a challenging schedule to assemble hundreds of parcels needed in the Central Valley. The complexity of getting federal, state and local regulatory approvals for the massive $68-billion project has already pushed back the start of construction to July from late last year. Even with that additional time, however, the state is facing a risk of not having the property to start major construction work near Fresno as now planned. It hopes to begin making purchase offers for land in the next several weeks. But that's only the first step in a convoluted legal process that will give farmers, businesses and homeowners leverage to delay the project by weeks, if not months, and drive up sales prices, legal experts say.

Jerry Brown's water plan faces mixed reviews [Sacramento Bee]
Nearly lost in the flurry of praise for Gov. Jerry Brown's State of the State address on Thursday were a handful of tersely worded statements from lawmakers objecting to his plan to build two water-diverting tunnels through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The controversy is decades old. Yet the pointed nature of the criticism – and the eagerness of even Democratic lawmakers to challenge Brown on a day in which tradition suggests restraint – laid bare how significant a test of Brown's political abilities the $14 billion project may be….Brown may not be asking the Legislature for its approval. The water project he proposes would be financed by water users and permitted administratively by the state and federal governments, and there is no technical requirement that Brown obtain the Legislature's blessing.

Valley air district $500 million fund targets diesel pollution [Fresno Bee]
As the economy shrunk government budgets over the past five years, a special air district fund quietly has grown tenfold -- beyond $100 million annually. But it's no slush fund, and it isn't the target of activist lawsuits. This obscure pot of money is a key to curbing diesel pollution, the biggest California air-quality problem of this era. It's the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District's incentive fund, bankrolled by government agencies, businesses and your vehicle registration fees.

Drakes Bay attorneys argue for injunction to keep oyster operation open [Marin Independent Journal]
A federal judge heard two hours of arguments Friday afternoon on whether a preliminary injunction should be granted to temporarily halt the closure of Drakes Bay Oyster Co. U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers appeared to lean toward the government's arguments to shut down the operation, but did not issue a ruling. That will come sometime in the coming weeks. A crowd filled the courtroom — which held 75 people — and several people hoping to attend the hearing had to remain outside. Drakes Bay owner Kevin Lunny — working with a legal team and with Cause of Action, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit organization — has already filed a separate lawsuit challenging the merits of the decision to let his lease lapse, a ruling made by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in November.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Friday, January 25, 2013




Gov. Brown puts a price tag on protecting major water supply [Southern California Public Radio KPCC-FM/Pasadena]
In his State of the State address Thursday, Gov. Jerry Brown reiterated his pitch to protect California’s water supply. But in a speech lawmakers repeatedly interrupted with applause, Brown’s plea to spend billions on water elicited silence. He was speaking to a joint session of the legislature, but his message is really for consumers — and the agencies that supply water to them. “My proposed plan is two tunnels, 30 miles long and 40 feet wide, designed to improve the ecology of the Delta, with almost 100 square miles of habitat restoration," Brown said. "Yes, that’s big, but so is the problem.” Brown said the plan is designed to protect the Delta’s water supply from an earthquake, a hundred-year storm or a rise in sea levels. The project would cost an estimated $14 billion to construct  the tunnels, and $5 billion to operate them. So who foots the bill?...Consumers would pay, but they don’t get to decide whether to build the Governor’s tunnels. Water suppliers make that call and pass the cost on to their customers.

Opinion: If Jerry Brown wants a legacy, he'll have to work for it [Sacramento Bee]
Gov. Jerry Brown uttered more than 3,000 words in just under 25 minutes Thursday, telling the Legislature – and 38 million other Californians – that the state is in good shape, getting better every day and can look forward to a bright future. "Two years ago," Brown concluded his State of the State speech, "they were writing our obituary. Well, it didn't happen. California is back, its budget is balanced, and we are on the move. Let's go out and get it done." And what would "it" be? The politician who once spoke disparagingly of "multipoint plans" offered a lengthy agenda Thursday, including changing school finance, bringing the poor into Obamacare, building water tunnels under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, starting a bullet train line, overhauling environmental laws and reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

Drakes Bay Oyster Co. goes to court to fight closure [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
Lawyers for the Drakes Bay Oyster Co. and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar will square off today before a federal judge in Oakland in the first round of a legal battle over the commercial oyster operation in the Point Reyes National Seashore. At stake is Salazar's decision in November not to renew a 40-year lease that gave oyster farm operator Kevin Lunny the right to commercial operations in 2,500-acre Drakes Estero, a five-fingered estuary that features extensive eelgrass beds and a harbor seal colony. The decision, hailed by wilderness advocates, gave Lunny's company 90 days to shut a business that plants and harvests 8 million oysters -- worth about $1.5 million a year -- from the near-pristine estero. The deadline was subsequently extended to March 15.

Tomato crop projected to remain steady [Stockton Record]
California tomato processors expect to contract with farmers for 13 million tons of production this year, up slightly from the 12.9 million tons in contracted production reported in 2012, federal and state farm officials recently reported. If accurate, it could signal the second-largest processing crop for the state. And while it would be a big crop historically, it's not much different from what California has seen since 2007, as the processing tomato harvest has run roughly from 12 million to 13 million tons annually. "When you look at it year over year, it's just steady as she goes," said Mike Montna, president and chief executive of the California Tomato Growers Association.

U.S. groups fear big price hikes, trade war over Mexican tomatoes [Reuters]
U.S. business groups warned on Thursday of skyrocketing tomato prices and a damaging trade war if President Barack Obama's administration follows through on a preliminary decision to end a long-standing tomato trade agreement with Mexico. "We are concerned as U.S. distributors about the ability to continue to be able to sell Mexican tomatoes with the tomato trade dispute that's going on between the United States and Mexico," said Lance Jungmeyer, president of the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas. He said a new pricing study had found that U.S. consumers would be hit with huge premiums for fresh tomatoes, with prices doubling or worse, if distributors were forced to withdraw Mexican tomatoes from the marketplace.

New wine group gaining steam in Mendocino County [Ukiah Daily Journal]
Six months after the Mendocino Winegrape and Wine Commission was voted down, a group poised to take over many of the commission's functions is taking shape. "We're picking up the banner, and there has been a lot of enthusiasm," said Zac Robinson, family owner of Husch Vineyards, who said that the biggest change between the commission and the new Mendocino Winegrowers, Inc., (MWI), is that participation is now voluntary. "By state law, everyone had to join (and contribute to) the commission," Robinson said. "We'll make some changes from what the commission did."

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Wednesday, January 23, 2013




Westland's $1 billion claim against U.S. rejected [Fresno Bee]
A federal court has quietly dismissed a $1 billion claim by the Westlands Water District, leaving unresolved the long-standing problem of coping with irrigation drainage in the San Joaquin Valley. Wading carefully into one of the West’s muddiest controversies, a U.S. Court of Federal Claims judge rejected arguments by Westlands, the nation’s largest water district, that the federal government should pay for failing to build a drainage system that carries away used irrigation water. The failure has vexed farmers and officials alike for several decades and incited multiple lawsuits. In her 56-page ruling, U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Emily C. Hewitt largely avoided the immense political, agricultural and environmental consequences. Instead, Hewitt reasoned that Westlands’ lawsuit, filed last February, failed for a combination of technical legal reasons, including her court’s limited jurisdiction and the expiration of a six-year statute of limitation.

Modesto, Turlock water users could be in for rate increase [Modesto Bee]
A state push to help Tuolumne River fish means bad news for farmers and Modesto water customers, irrigation leaders heard in a somber update Tuesday. Water and power rates eventually would rise for customers of the Modesto and Turlock irrigation districts because the agencies would get less water, an attorney told the MID board. The proposal also would affect a water treatment plant supplying tap water to Modesto and some nearby communities, although wells also contribute to the city's water network. "This is another example of where the city and farmers should be aligned rather than allowing (the state) to divide and conquer us," MID board Chairman Nick Blom said.

Effectiveness of automated water delivery gates in question [Imperial Valley Press]
As the Imperial Irrigation District moves forward with an ambitious multi-faceted water conservation program that, in part, calls for the installation of automated gates and electronic measuring devices, the effectiveness of the automated gates is in question. “It’s been brought to my attention numerous times … from farming concerns to the people that have to make them work, and all I’m hearing is they don’t work,” Director Bruce Kuhn said at Tuesday’s Board of Directors meeting. The issue, he said, is the gates don’t work as designed, nor do they accommodate the variable environmental conditions that the district’s water infrastructure deals with, like the build-up of silt, which can interfere with the operation of the gates.

Lettuce prices jump due to cold snap [Orange County Register]
Though it's warming up in Southern California, consumers are feeling the chill of this winter's cold spell. Most of the food industry feared damage to California's citrus crop. But the real harm is hitting produce grown in Southern California and parts of Arizona – a major source for winter greens across the U.S. Retail and wholesale prices for everything from iceberg lettuce to asparagus are soaring because of shortages and crop damage. Warning signs have gone up in some supermarkets. Price hikes are also hurting restaurants, where some vegetables have more than doubled in cost.

S.J. farmers sought for ethanol project [Stockton Record]
A seed producer is recruiting area farmers to produce sorghum, a grain crop also known as milo, for use in ethanol production, including at the Pacific Ethanol Inc. plant in Stockton. Chromatin Inc. will host a meeting Feb. 5 in Modesto, hoping to convince growers to plant thousands of acres of grain sorghum this spring to supply Aemetis in Keyes and Calgren in Pixley, as well as Pacific Ethanol. "We're shooting to get 30,000 acres this summer to support the three ethanol plants," said John Fulcher, director of business development, speaking Tuesday from Chromatin offices in Chicago.

Grant will assist student farmers [Napa Valley Register]
A teacher at Napa Valley Language Academy plans to give her students a memorable lesson about agriculture. Garden and science teacher Michelle Risso recently received a $500 grant, which will help students plant several different vegetables and fruits in the school garden this spring. In the fall, the school’s second graders will sell their harvest at the local farmers market at the Oxbow. Risso is one of 25 educators across the state who were awarded “Literacy for Life” grants from the California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Tuesday, January 22, 2013




Sinking land makes Valley levees unreliable [Fresno Bee]
In the spring seven years ago, the San Joaquin River filled with snowmelt after a big winter and threatened destruction across western Madera and Merced counties. Miles of earthen walls -- levees -- kept the river from ripping through millions of dollars worth of farmland, crops, barns and roads. But since that perilous spring, some of those earthen walls have sunk along with a swath of the west San Joaquin Valley landscape, due to farm water pumping. The levees probably won't stop a big flow of water now….The sinking landscape has been accelerated by farmers who are supporting crop expansions, water leaders say. The farmers, who are east of the river in Madera County, have no other source of water. They did not realize their deep-water pumping was creating a problem….Area farmers and water districts are working together to help those who have no access to river water for irrigation.

Studies will help assess Tuolumne River's future [Modesto Bee]
All sides of a high-stakes struggle over Tuolumne River water got tons of new ammunition Thursday with the partial release of critical studies. Thousands of pages of technical documents will be parsed by many interest groups heading into key Jan. 30-31 public meetings that could help decide whether more should be done for fish, perhaps at the expense of irrigation….The multiyear process, expected to cost more than $50 million, requires 35 studies, with almost half dedicated to fish. Twenty-three are complete; they and progress reports on the others were unveiled Thursday. The Stanislaus County Farm Bureau is highly interested in a section focusing on economic value provided by the dam, including water consumed by orchards, crops and people….California water officials recently proposed that dams release more water to help fish in the Tuolumne and Merced rivers. The State Water Resources Control Board could take action in August. Irrigators face even more scrutiny from other agencies, said Tom Orvis, governmental affairs director for the Stanislaus County Farm Bureau. "It's a flipping spider web and they all have individual goals," Orvis said.

Local farmers say they already comply with FDA proposals [Ventura County Star]
New food safety rules aiming to overhaul the nation's food supply chain are not scaring Ventura County's larger growers. Rather, many say they are already following the regulations and are actually in favor of them…."Many companies are already essentially compliant and doing more than the expectations in the proposed rule," said Trevor Suslow, an extension research specialist with UC Davis who specializes in microbial food safety of fruits and vegetables for the fresh-cut industry. "The whole thing is moving from guidance in produce food safety to regulations in produce food safety."…"Maybe these are new for the FDA but they are certainly not new for the agriculture industry," said Chris Summers, global food safety and compliance manager for Mission Produce Inc. in Oxnard, one of the world's largest avocado distributors, which contracts out growers in Ventura County and five other counties.

County offers ideas for resolving oil-ag conflict [Bakersfield Californian]
County staff are asking the Board of Supervisors Tuesday for conceptual approval of measures they hope will restore peace between local growers and oil producers. A set of proposals by county Planning Director Lorelei Oviatt offers short- and long-term ideas for dealing with conflicts that have arisen in recent years as oil producers increasingly set up drilling operations on Kern farmland. Her near-term plan would require mineral rights owners such as oil and gas producers to work out land use details with surface property owners, primarily growers. If their talks reach an impasse -- and if it's unrelated to the issues of financial compensation or environmental impacts -- then either party could appeal to the Board of Supervisors for a final ruling.

Value of recyclables spawns new cycle of crime in Monterey County [Salinas Californian]
Once associated with saving the planet by finding new uses for old materials, reducing trash and the consumption of raw materials, recycling has entered into the dark shadows of night and felony theft. A sinister cottage industry has evolved in which profits are made through the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars in materials, resulting in a rising cost in repairs and replacements to the targeted companies and farmers. “Unintended consequences,” said Norm Groot, executive director for the Monterey County Farm Bureau, describing the outcome of recycling efforts. “Metal thefts have gone rampant with prices so high.”…Shortly after the implementation of new regulations in 2008, Galvan said he began visiting recycling centers in Monterey County to explain the new law and help businesses with training, provide handouts in English and Spanish, and list the new rules of operation and business practices. A few months later Galvan said he followed up with an undercover, investigative operation of the same recycling businesses. Undercover agents, posing as customers, tried to sell a variety of materials to recycling operators. All the recycling centers Galvan investigated failed to follow the law.

Cheese Wars: Wisconsin cheesemakers stand to profit from mayhem in California dairy industry [Wisconsin State Journal]
Wisconsin's cheese producers are poised to profit — perhaps mightily — from a feud that has buckled the knees of California's dysfunctional dairy industry. California cheesemakers have prospered for decades because the price of milk used to make cheese has been set lower than what competitors from other states, including Wisconsin, pay. Now, California's financially strapped dairy farmers are saying their future depends on whether their state's cheese producers can be forced to pay the same price as everybody else. If California cheesemakers are forced onto a level playing field, sales of Wisconsin cheese — estimated at about $5 billion — could increase by $200 million, according to a top dairy industry executive from Wisconsin.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.