Friday, January 31, 2014

Ag Today Wednesday, January 29, 2014


House sends farm bill compromise to the Senate [Los Angeles Times]
The House of Representatives easily approved a new five-year farm bill Wednesday, ending nearly two years of contentious debate over how to cut agriculture subsidies and nutrition programs. The final vote was 251-166. The Senate is expected to begin considering the compromise bill, which was unveiled Monday by House and Senate negotiators, early next week. The final product averts deep cuts sought by Republicans in the federal food stamp program and ends direct payments to farmers — a controversial provision under the previous farm bill in which farmers received federal subsidies regardless of their output.

Valley GOP leaders regroup after drought-relief maneuver fails [Fresno Bee]
San Joaquin Valley congressional Republicans took aim this week and missed their stated goal of helping California cope with drought. Now, having unsuccessfully tried a long-shot, last-minute farm bill maneuver, the GOP lawmakers are regrouping. Their next steps, though unclear, are certainly on the way….One key question now is whether this week’s failed effort to add California water language to a farm bill poisons the well or builds effective long-term pressure. Another question is what political lessons might be learned to ease future drought action. There’s also the question of what future legislation would look like.

California Farms Going Thirsty as Drought Burns $5 Billion Hole [Bloomberg News]
…The drought in California, the top U.S. agricultural producer at $44.7 billion, is depriving the state of water needed to produce everything from milk, beef and wine to some of the nation’s largest fruit and vegetable crops, including avocados, strawberries and almonds. Lost revenue in 2014 from farming and related businesses such as trucking and processing could reach $5 billion, according to estimates by the 300-member California Farm Water Coalition, an industry group….Farmers in the state probably will leave as much as 500,000 acres unplanted, or about 12 percent of last year’s principal crops, because they won’t have enough water to produce a harvest, which will mean fewer choices and higher prices for consumers, said Mike Wade, executive director of the California Farm Water Coalition, a Sacramento-based group of farmers, water district managers and farm-related businesses.

Oakdale Irrigation District directors vote to reject Westlands water deal [Modesto Bee]
A proposal to pay Oakdale landowners to fallow their pastures so irrigation water could be sold to Fresno-area farmers was rejected Tuesday morning.
Oakdale Irrigation District directors voted 4-1 to reverse Thursday’s decision, which would have kept the proposed Westlands Water District deal alive.
OID directors said they changed their minds after being flooded with phone calls from Oakdale farmers and ranchers opposed to selling water to outsiders during this drought.

Lawsuit filed to stop new water wells in Stanislaus County [Modesto Bee]
A just-filed lawsuit seeks a court order to stop Stanislaus County from issuing new well construction permits without first requiring environmental reviews. Lawyers representing two environmental groups submitted the “complaint for declaratory relief,” which court officials were processing Tuesday….The lawsuit contends that Stanislaus’ well permit policy is unlawful because it allows new groundwater wells to be drilled without determining whether they may have significant adverse environmental effects. The California Environmental Quality Act requires that such reviews be done, according to the lawyers. At issue are hundreds of large wells – primarily for agricultural irrigation in eastern Stanislaus – that were approved last year by the county. New wells continue to be granted permits almost daily.

Editorial: Our View: Brown’s FFA funding could be a concern [Imperial Valley Press]
That Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget proposal aims to unlock the $4.1 million in categorical funding that makes up in some cases the lion’s share of FFA funding is a bit scary….FFA education isn’t cheap. There are many costs born that other public school programs never see. Again, local control for schools is important where at the local level administrators hopefully know where to use it and how to use it. That is the plus. The minus will be to see if that occurs, and in this case, to make sure FFA gets its due.
It would be a shame, in Imperial County, California, where ag is king, to see a district not use the money for its ag programs.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment