Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Ag Today Thursday, December 26, 2013


Do water woes help 2014 bond? [Capitol Weekly]
When it comes to water, there’s bad news flowing for the state and its farmers, water agencies, customers, environmentalists, home owners, towns, landscapers — you name it — as California faces a third consecutive dry year. But even as the rain clouds appear sparse, there may be a silver lining for the backers of a major ballot measure: Experts say the grim outlook could spur voters to approve a multibillion-dollar bond facing voters in November 2014. It could bring to reality the need to borrow money and resolve some of the state’s water issues.

Dry: Drought worries weighing on North State water managers [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
Several weeks ago, as California emerged from its second consecutive dry year, Yuba County Water Agency General Manager Curt Aikens was withholding judgment about the possibility of the local drought stretching into its third year. But after looking at the long-term forecast and examining New Bullards Bar storage levels, Aikens is withholding judgment no more. "We have the foundation for a historically dry year," Aikens said Tuesday.

Delta tunnels plan's true price tag: As much as $67 billion [San Jose Mercury News]
For more than a year, Gov. Jerry Brown's administration has been describing his plan to build two massive water tunnels through the Delta as a $25 billion project. That would rank it as one of the largest public works plans in California history. But when factoring in long-term financing costs, the price tag actually ranges from $51 billion to $67 billion, according to new figures that emerged last month…."The numbers are big. There is sticker shock," said Jason Peltier, chief deputy general manager of the Westlands Water District, an agency in Fresno that provides water to farmers. "We keep going back to our policy people and saying 'Yes, this is tough to look at, but consider your other scenarios. How much more groundwater can we pump?' That kind of thing."

Immigration-bill pressure backfires [Wall Street Journal]
Supporters of an immigration overhaul, looking for allies in the Republican-led House, concluded months ago that a top prospect would be Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy….But an aggressive campaign to win his support appears to have backfired. People who have talked to him say Mr. McCarthy is less inclined to support an overhaul after protests at his district office by overhaul backers that, in turn, provoked counter-protests and TV ads from opponents of the legislation….The difficulty in winning over Mr. McCarthy, with his immigrant-dependent district, shows the steep challenge that immigration activists face as they push the House to pass legislation resisted by powerful voices in the Republican Party.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

Commentary: Our View: New farm bill on the horizon [Modesto Bee]
There’s a good chance Congress will come back from its winter recess in January and pass a farm bill….The farm bill is one of those huge, omnibus laws that reaches far beyond the farm gate. Many believe it exists only to help Midwestern corporate farmers. But it also helps feed poor children, affects prices of everything from fuel to fruit cups and, here in the San Joaquin Valley, plays a big role in cleaning up our air and water….By helping our area farmers, we’ll be helping everyone in our part of the valley.

Editorial: Making the Rim fire damage worse [Los Angeles Times]
Loggers have an ally in Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Elk Grove), whose irresponsible bill would allow almost unfettered timber operations throughout the burn area, heedlessly crushing the forest's recovery and undermining a history of science-based environmental review that is supposed to govern logging in national forests…. There is one grain of sense to McClintock's absurd giveaway to the logging industry. There might be good, damaged but salvageable lumber that can be taken with little if any environmental damage — mainly relatively young trees along existing roads. But there's a solution that makes more sense. Congress should appropriate funds for a timely and independent study of Stanislaus recovery, resulting in a plan that allows for limited logging, where appropriate. Replanting might be called for in areas adjacent to inhabited towns to avoid mudslides. But according to forest scientists, most burn areas are best left to regenerate themselves, even those as unimaginably large as the Stanislaus.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment