Friday, March 7, 2014

Ag Today Wednesday, March 5, 2014


Drought Watch: Farmers fear water cutoff [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
A single sentence sparked widespread concern among the agricultural community that the state could drop all water allocations to farms to zero in 2014. That sentence in a notice from the State Water Resources Control Board involved a requirement to maintain a minimum amount of water in state reservoirs at the end of September to meet "health and safety needs" in the event of a continued drought next year.…The notice prompted the California Rice Commission to send out an update stating "that the State Water Resources Control Board is actively considering action to take emergency control over all surface water in the state." The update goes on to state the board intended to provide a 0 percent allocation to agriculture for the year. The board would not speculate on the repercussions of maintaining a minimum level for reservoirs in September, said board spokesman George Kostyrko.

State officials hear Valley drought pleas [Modesto Bee]
Farmers and their allies pleaded with state officials Tuesday for quick action on the drought emergency and long-term solutions to keep it from happening again. More than 200 people packed a University of California at Merced conference room for a meeting of Gov. Jerry Brown’s Drought Task Force and the State Board of Food and Agriculture. “Your decisions will have a long and lasting effect on the local, regional and state economy,” said Aldo Sansoni, who grows almonds, tomatoes and other crops in Merced County. Speakers warned that the drought, now in its third and by far worst year, could put many people out of work….The drought is forcing well pumping that could worsen the land subsidence problem in parts of Merced County, said Jean Okuye, a Livingston-area almond grower and president of the county Farm Bureau. She urged wastewater recycling and other measures to keep farms in production.

In California, drought plays out unexpectedly [Wall Street Journal]
As the Golden State suffers through a three-year drought, residents of semiarid Southern California are mostly being asked to voluntarily conserve water. In typically wetter Northern California, residents are faced with mandatory rationing. In the battle for water supplies in the state, where the south has traditionally been characterized as an endlessly thirsty drain on water from the north, this turnabout is the result of years of preparation and billions of dollars of infrastructure improvements….The impact of the drought reverberates beyond the state's borders. Because California boasts a bigger agricultural sector than any other state, the drought could lead to higher produce prices nationally….Southern California has invested billions of dollars in recent years to expand its infrastructure to hold, transfer and recycle water while increasing conservation. Spending on water projects in much of the north, meanwhile, has been far more sporadic and less ambitious, officials say.

Judge: Kings County high-speed rail lawsuit can move forward [Fresno Bee]
A Sacramento judge ruled Tuesday that Kings County and two of its residents can forge ahead with a challenge to the California High-Speed Rail Authority over its statewide bullet-train plans. Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny denied a request by the rail agency to dismiss the second stage of a lawsuit that questions whether the state's proposed high-speed train system complies with state law. The ruling appears to set the stage for a trial in which the two sides are expected to present a string of experts to argue over the design of the 520-mile line that would run between San Francisco and Los Angeles through the San Joaquin Valley and whether it conforms to requirements in Proposition 1A, the $9.9 billion high-speed rail bond measure approved by California voters in 2008.

Proposed immigrant processing center roils Central Coast farmworkers [Los Angeles Times]
…Federal authorities proposed building a processing center about eight miles away in Santa Maria for convicted criminals who are in the country illegally….Officials considered it a non-event, a minor real estate deal, a blip on a planning commission agenda. But many immigrant farmworkers viewed the building as a powerful symbol of the U.S. deportation machinery, and that allowing it to be built in Santa Maria, where they have long felt welcome, amounted to a betrayal by city and federal officials. The proposal has prompted a flurry of protests unlike any in memory here — "even in the heyday of Cesar Chavez," said Richard S. Quandt, the veteran general counsel of the Grower Shipper Assn. of Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties, a trade group….That is precisely the problem, Quandt said: If Santa Maria gets a reputation as being hostile to farm laborers, the whole thing — the bedrock of the local economy — could collapse. There is a labor shortage in the California fields as it is, and reputation matters.

Fresno County sees spike in metal theft [KFSN TV/Fresno]
Metal thefts in Fresno County are the worst they they've been in the past five years. Mike Chapman with the Fresno County Sheriff's Office Ag Task Force says about $1.4 million worth of metals were stolen in 2013.…That number has been gradually increasing since 2009, when the only around $300,000 of metals were taken. In 2010, it jumped to around $650,000; in 2011 it increased again to $950,000 and last year, the total values of stolen metals were estimated at $1.1-million. "While typically the crook is taking $20 to $40, it's going to cost that farmer many times more, about tens of thousands of dollars to replace," explained Ryan Jacobsen, director of the Fresno County Farm Bureau. "At this point, it's not what farmer has been affected; it's what farmer hasn't been affected."…Chapman and Jacobsen says another problem is proving a theft. That's why they are encouraging farmers to mark their equipment.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment