Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Ag Today Monday, March 17, 2014


Exchange Contractors rally at emergency meeting in Los Banos [Merced Sun-Star]
Exchange contractor officials are rallying residents to protest against potential reduction or outright cessation of water deliveries to thousands of land owners on the West Side….Potentially, officials said, the state water board could cause the State Water Project and the Central Valley Project agricultural surface water deliveries to cease until 2015….Officials at the meeting also touched on how the decision may impact many across the state and, more important, the local economy….Exchange contractors have put together a long-term plan they are prepared to submit to the state water board no later than March 21. They are asking the community to help by joining them at the rally in Firebaugh and by writing letters to state and federal elected officials to help protect the water rights.

For Imperial Valley farmers, abundant water amid drought [Los Angeles Times]
…While other areas — including the farm belt of the Central Valley — face immediate supply cutbacks, the Imperial Valley continues to have all the water it can use….The valley's share is ensured by agreements among the seven states that depend on the river, starting with the 1922 Colorado River Compact. In water law, one rule is supreme: "First in time, first in right."…The drought is largely a rumor here, but one with ominous overtones: that outside forces with political clout might try to force the valley to sell some of its water, as was done a decade ago, or even try to take a portion. "We recognize we live in an area that is blessed to have strong, senior rights on the Colorado River," said Linsey Dale, executive director of the county Farm Bureau. "We are aware that other areas are desperate for the water we have."

West’s drought and growth intensify conflict over water rights [New York Times]
Across the parched American West, the long drought has set off a series of fierce legal and political battles over who controls an increasingly dear treasure — water….Residents of the arid West have always scrapped over water. But years of persistent drought are now intensifying those struggles, and the explosive growth — and thirst — of Western cities and suburbs is raising their stakes to an entirely new level….California, in the midst of a major drought, so far has witnessed but a few local skirmishes. In January, environmentalists and sport fishermen sued to halt the drilling of hundreds of new groundwater wells sought by Central Valley farmers, saying more pumping would lower stream levels. That may not last long, said Stuart Somach, a Sacramento water-rights lawyer….“We’re very close to the time that people are going to start staking out rights. We’re right at the cusp,” Mr. Somach said.

Continuing to pump, San Joaquin Valley irrigation districts selling surplus [Modesto Bee]
Irrigation districts provide water that’s key to agricultural prosperity in the Northern San Joaquin Valley, but some of those districts also have been cashing in on the region’s water resources. They’ve sold nearly $140 million worth of water to out-of-district agencies during the past decade. At the same time, they’ve pumped nearly 1.5 million acre-feet of groundwater – that’s 487 billion gallons – from the region’s aquifers. Concerns about falling groundwater levels persuaded Stanislaus County supervisors to outlaw groundwater mining last fall, but their ordinance exempted irrigation districts from the ban….Irrigation district leaders who have sold to outsiders insist they’ve done nothing wrong. They say they’ve always pumped groundwater, even when they weren’t selling water to others. Some water experts and community leaders, however, question the wisdom of pumping from this region’s declining aquifers before irrigating with water available from reservoirs and other sources of surface water.

Columnist: Feds' silence on Rim fire fuels mistrust in Tuolumne [Modesto Bee]
…This week, I drove with Shaun Crook to see the devastation at Meyers Ranch and the forest. The Crook family and other cattle ranchers hold grazing permits in the Rim fire area….The difference between the privately owned lands and government lands is obvious as well. Sierra Pacific Industries, which owns about 17,000 acres in the area, kept the undergrowth to a minimum because it enabled its trees to grow faster. Crews are well into salvaging its burned timber and replanting its lands. Government-owned land, meanwhile, was dense with thinner trees and lots of undergrowth that helped fuel the blaze and will fuel more debate about the way the forests are managed. Some believe they never should be logged or managed in any way but should be left to nature. Others, Crook among them, believe the timber and cattle interests are the truer stewards of the land and take better care of it because they have a vested interest in doing so. They also believe the better managed lands burned primarily because of the fuel that amassed in the lesser-managed and adjacent areas of the forest.

Commentary:  OR-7’s return and expanding Oregon wolf population are wake-up calls for California [Sacramento Bee]
…The repeated return of the wolf who spent 15 months in California before wandering back into Oregon late last year – and who has now made California part of his range for each of the past four years – poses a serious challenge for officials spinning the state narrative on wolves. With healthy wolf populations continuing to expand in neighboring Oregon in recent months, the reality on the ground confirms what scientists have long been telling us – wolves will return to California. The question now is whether the California Fish & Game commissioners who have the final word on state wolf protections will follow the science or the politics when they make their ruling this spring.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment