Thursday, April 11, 2013

Ag Today Wednesday, April 3, 2013




Immigration bill envisions new farm worker program [Associated Press]
Sweeping immigration legislation taking shape in the Senate will aim to overhaul the nation's agriculture worker program to create a steady supply of labor for farmers and growers, who rely more than any other industry on workers who have come to the country illegally. Farm workers already here would get a speedier path to legal status than other immigrants in the country illegally, and a likely new visa program would make it easier for foreign workers to come to the U.S. Policymakers aim to install such workers in place of the half or more of the nation's farm labor workforce estimated to be in the country illegally. Negotiators have been working to finalize an agreement in time for the measure to be included in bipartisan legislation expected to be released next week, but disagreements on wages and numbers of visas are proving tough to solve.

House immigration bill is said to offer 3 paths [New York Times]
In the shadow of a bipartisan Senate group preparing to roll out broad immigration legislation next week, shortly after Congress returns from its holiday break, a bipartisan group of eight House members is readying its own bill. In contrast to the Senate plan — which would provide one clear, if difficult, path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants already in the country — the House legislation will most likely offer three distinct paths to legal status. Young immigrants in the country without legal papers, who often call themselves “Dreamers,” and low-skilled agricultural workers would qualify for an expedited road to legal status, people familiar with the negotiations said. The Dreamers should not be punished for being brought illegally to the country by their parents, House aides said, and the members agreed that the agricultural workers perform crucial work for the economy.

Editorial: A shockingly sensible immigration plan [Los Angeles Times]
The recent agreement between business and labor leaders on how to provide visas for nonagricultural workers in such industries as construction, hotels and restaurants is a surprising and welcome development. Such a breakthrough agreement would have been unthinkable a year ago, when the debate over comprehensive immigration reform was mired in anger and overheated preelection rhetoric….Frankly, the plan reflects a shockingly sensible set of compromises, and we hope a similar burst of reasonableness will allow an agreement to be reached between agricultural growers and labor that would address the industry's reliance on undocumented farmhands….Meeting the needs of growers while protecting the rights of farmworkers won't be easy, and the solution must be rooted in the realities of the labor market. But there is already a good blueprint to work from. The Agriculture Job Opportunities, Benefits and Security Act, first introduced in 2007, would allow farmworkers who are already here to legalize their status if they pay a fine and continue to work in the fields for at least three years, and it offers a sensible outline for overhauling the H-2A visa program to ensure that foreign workers don't drive down wages for American workers who are employed on farms.

Engineers suggest west-of-Hanford route for high-speed trains [Fresno Bee]
A route skirting Hanford's western edge through Kings County is now the option recommended by engineers for a high-speed train route between Fresno and Bakersfield. The California High-Speed Rail Authority announced the recommendation Tuesday….In late 2011, the rail authority proposed a route that carried the tracks east of Hanford, drawing the ire of farmers and homeowners whose property would be displaced. In reaction to the uproar -- and at the insistence of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -- the authority began to reconsider other options, including bypassing Hanford to the west….Mark McLoughlin, the authority's deputy director of environmental planning, said in a memo to the agency's board that the preferred option creates fewer environmental effects on natural resources, farmland, businesses and homes than other alternatives that have been studied.

Oakdale Irrigation District OKs water sale for West Side farmers [Modesto Bee]
The Oakdale Irrigation District board voted Tuesday to sell water to help West Side farmers for one year and to permanently serve about 7,200 acres just east of its boundary. The 5-0 votes came with no objections from the audience.…The district will sell 40,000 acre-feet of its Stanislaus River water to the San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority, made up of numerous irrigation districts from the Tracy area to Fresno County, and the California Department of Water Resources. The water, combined with an equal amount approved by the South San Joaquin Irrigation District board, will help several West Side districts deal with a sharp cutback in federal deliveries because of drought and fish protections.

IID to consider water storage [Imperial Valley Press]
The Imperial Irrigation District is considering the development of water storage facilities within its service area as a means to ensure sufficient water supplies in the midst of water shortages on the Colorado River.…The IID’s annual entitlement from the Colorado River is capped at 3.1 million acre-feet per year. Any water that the district uses in excess of this cap has to be paid back. Water that the district does not use flows to junior water right holders such as the Coachellla Valley Water District and Metropolitan Water District. The IID does not currently have the means to store water.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.


No comments:

Post a Comment