Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Ag Today Monday, March 18, 2013




Hearings set next week on plan to restore delta, SF bay [Modesto Bee]
An epic struggle over rivers is heading toward a showdown Wednesday, and the ultimate decision could affect just about everyone. So worried are farm interests that they've reserved a bus to haul supporters to hearings in Sacramento, if enough people sign up….At issue is the board's idea for restoring the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Francisco Bay, called the Bay-Delta Plan for short. Its relevant catch phrase is "unimpaired flow," reflecting how much water would flow down rivers, through the delta and into the bay if not for dams. Decimated salmon and migratory trout populations could rebound if springtime flow would return to 60 percent of unimpaired flow, scientists say, and fish advocates like that number better than the current 17 percent to 20 percent. That would mean lots more water flowing in rivers from February through June, instead of being trapped in dams to quench thirsty crops later in the summer and fall.

Health hazard: West Fresno the riskiest place to live in California [Fresno Bee]
The California Environmental Protection Agency takes it a step further. EPA says people in West Fresno live with higher health risks than anyone in California -- higher than any part of Los Angeles, Oakland or any place else you can name….The state EPA's draft documents show the Valley has nine of the 12 worst places in California, including four in Fresno County and three in Stockton. The map of California's worst 10% shows mostly Valley ZIP codes. The state's designations will be part of a program called California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool, or CalEnviroScreen….Businesses and industries worry that the science is vague and might be misused by government agencies….The California Farm Bureau Federation last month wrote a letter to the state EPA, saying the screening tool makes it look as though pesticide use equates to 100% exposure. "These pesticides have the strictest application and use regulations (buffer zones, worker safety clothing requirements, restricted entry intervals, etc.) of any pesticide applications nationwide," wrote Cynthia Cory, the Farm Bureau group's director of environmental affairs.

Suit accuses EPA of ignoring harmful pesticides [Associated Press]
A federal judge is considering whether to dismiss a sweeping lawsuit claiming the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency allowed hundreds of pesticides to be used despite evidence of harmful effects on more than 200 endangered and threatened species. The Center for Biological Diversity and Pesticide Action Network North America allege the EPA has allowed the pesticide use without required consultations with federal agencies to study the impacts….Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero heard arguments on Friday on motions by the EPA and pesticide industry to dismiss the 2011 lawsuit. Spero told attorneys he was initially inclined to grant the EPA's dismissal motion. But after hearing arguments from both sides, the judge said his ruling would not be issued anytime soon, Giese said.

Demand grows for new farm jobs visa [USA Today]
As the White House and Congress try to settle on the first major overhaul of immigration laws in a quarter-century, a point of simple agreement would appear to be that the nation’s crop producers need a legal and reliable pool of workers. Otherwise, produce will be left rotting in the fields. This is the one piece of the immigration puzzle that affects all Americans, as the stability and affordability of the food supply is at stake. Members of Congress keenly aware of this problem say that if they can’t reach agreement on farm visas, there will be little hope for any meaningful progress on immigration. Bipartisan groups in both chambers of Congress have been trying to finalize their bills by this week before leaving Washington for a two-week break. Although they’ve reached agreement on many aspects of the immigration overhaul — including enhancements to border security, a pathway to citizenship for the nation’s 11 million illegal immigrants and enforcement of immigration law — the farm visa controversy festers.

U.S. Supreme Court will divine the legal stakes in Valley raisin wars [Fresno Bee]
Dissident raisin growers will soon get their day in the U.S. Supreme Court sun, with a case that's juicier than it seems….The case, scheduled for an hour-long oral argument, pits Marvin and Laura Horne, proprietors of Raisin Valley Farms, and their allies against the U.S. Department of Agriculture. More broadly, the case is the latest front in a series of long-running disputes between farmers who like to go their own way and farmers who prefer to unite for collective action….The underlying legal challenge, though not the precise issue that will be heard by the Supreme Court, involves the raisin marketing order. Authorized by Congress, and approved by industry, marketing orders can undertake various actions to boost demand and stabilize prices, including regulating how much product enters the open market.

Debate over genetically modified organisms precedes UCD conference [Sacramento Bee]
Droughts. Population explosions. Salty soils. These are the problems that many say will cause worldwide food shortages in coming decades…. Finding a solution will be one of the many subjects at this week's Climate-Smart Agriculture Global Science Conference at UC Davis. Hundreds of scientists and policymakers from around the world will convene at Davis from Tuesday through Saturday to grapple with these problems and others, many wrought by climate change. UC Davis plant biologist Eduardo Blumwald, who will speak at the conference, says he knows what needs to be done – further development and use of genetically modified crops, also known as GMOs for genetically modified organisms. Not every scientist agrees.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

No comments:

Post a Comment