Monday, April 29, 2013

Ag Today Thursday, April 25, 2013




Immigration bill uncertain in House [Wall Street Journal]
The last time House Republicans passed a broad immigration overhaul, they called for expedited deportations and tougher criminal penalties, but did nothing to expand guest-worker programs or address the millions of immigrants in the country illegally. Now, more than seven years later, many lawmakers who backed that bill are vowing another tough stand if the Senate passes a bill to expand work visas and create a pathway to citizenship for people now in the country illegally….At the same time, there are reasons to believe Republicans there will be more receptive this time to provisions rejected in 2005….One of the Republicans involved in the broader discussions is first-year Rep. David Valadao, whose district in California's Central Valley is more than 70% Hispanic. He argues that even districts with small Latino populations would benefit from expanded legal immigration, because their constituents benefit from economic activity elsewhere in the country.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

GMO foods subject of bill in U.S. Senate [San Francisco Chronicle]
On the heels of last year's defeat on the issue in California, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., have introduced a bill to order the Food and Drug Administration to mandate the labeling of genetically engineered foods. The legislation, which would require food manufacturers and stores to tag items made with genetically modified ingredients or grown from genetically engineered seeds, has support from both sides of the aisle, including more than 20 co-sponsors combined in the Senate and House of Representatives. It has been hailed by food labeling advocates as a boon for consumers who have repeatedly tried to get such laws passed. California's Proposition 37, a referendum on requiring genetically engineered food labeling last year, failed to pass. Boxer tried to pass a similar bill, without success, in 2000. But activists say that Boxer and DeFazio's proposed legislation shows that demand for a genetically engineered labeling law has reached critical mass.

Yellow frog, Yosemite toad close to ESA protection [Associated Press]
The Yosemite toad and the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog share some critical mountain habitat and now an unenviable distinction: both are being proposed for federal Endangered Species Act protection. Yellow-legged frogs, which live throughout the Sierra Nevada, have declined in numbers in recent years due to habitat destruction, predation by non-native trout in mountain waterways, the drifting of pesticides to the mountains from farm fields and climate change. Yosemite toads are threatened primarily by livestock grazing, climate change and pesticides, according to the Center for Biological Diversity, which has pushed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to speed up protection decisions.…The proposal, announced Wednesday, includes designating 2 million acres of critical habitat for the amphibians. The listings could impact some federal permits on grazing land, a situation that is frustrating members of the California Cattlemen's Association.

Wild dogs kill hundreds of goats [Stockton Record]
The San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office conducted air and ground searches Wednesday for a pack of wild dogs that has slaughtered hundreds of goats in French Camp, and one dog was shot when it advanced toward a deputy, authorities said. The dogs are believed to be responsible for at least six attacks at five locations since April 11, said Deputy Les Garcia, a spokesman for the Sheriff's Office. The bloodiest attack occurred Monday, when 160 goats were killed at the Stockton Livestock Auction Yards on East French Camp Road, Garcia said. Auction yard manager Joe Mayar said 87 goats were found dead and 73 others were euthanized because of injuries to their throats and limbs, costing his business $35,000.…The dogs have killed at least 240 goats in the area, Mayar said.

Shorebirds fit into puzzling future of rice farming [Davis Enterprise]
Yolo County’s rice farmland is home to more than one entity that needs to cope with changes in order to survive. “We get up every morning, look for the sunshine, and hope it’s going to be a good day,” said Yolo County rice farmer Jack De Witte. His 1,500-acre stretch of land sprawls in the Yolo Bypass, and neighbors many unlikely allies — long-legged shorebirds wading in wetlands. The two — the rice farmer and the (native and migratory) waterbirds — are reliant on one another in their less than ideal circumstances.

Editorial: Preparing county for ag’s future [Santa Maria Times]
It seemed evident many years ago that, at some point, decision makers in Santa Barbara County would need to choose between agriculture and residential/commercial development as the dominant social configuration.…As the years passed, it became just as evident that agriculture would remain an integral part of the local culture, social fabric and economy….Which is what the Board of Supervisors had in mind last week by unanimously approving a series of land-use recommendations, the purpose of which is to establish a more formal and official buffer between farm/ranch lands and residential/commercial development….Protecting agriculture and developers from each other makes perfect sense for Santa Barbara County, which is an eclectic mix of urban chic and dusty-booted wranglers. It’s a balance worth protecting, and the county’s new rules about buffering without fencing off seems a good way to maintain that balance.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

No comments:

Post a Comment