Friday, December 5, 2014

Ag Today Wednesday, November 5, 2014


Californians pass $7.5 billion water bond [Associated Press]
Californians struggling through a historic drought overwhelmingly approved a massive plan to invest in the state's outdated water system to minimize the impact of future dry years. Proposition 1 passed Tuesday, authorizing $7.5 billion that won't address today's drought, but can be used to build two new reservoirs and invest in conservation measures, water recycling and groundwater cleanup. Details need to be refined to make sure the money is spent equally for benefit throughout the state, said Paul Wenger, president of the California Farm Bureau Federation. "We're all California," he said. "If we allow ourselves to be divided by regional differences, there's no hope to come to a good conclusion."…Wenger said voters sent a clear message that they want attention to the state's water system. "We're hoping that the legislators and Congress will take heed and allow for better management of our current water infrastructure," he said.

San Benito County's Measure J: Voters back anti-fracking plan [San Jose Mercury News]
San Benito County voters on Tuesday approved a groundbreaking ballot measure that outlaws the controversial oil extraction technique known as fracking. San Benito County residents heavily supported Measure J, overcoming the oil industry's well-funded opposition campaign. A similar measure in Santa Barbara County, backed by environmentalists there, appeared to be heading to defeat….The issue has pitted farmers, ranchers and others in the usually sleepy county against each other. Measure J supporters say fracking and an oil boom would threaten the local environment, notably the water supply, citing problems in states such as Texas and North Dakota. But critics of the measure argue it goes too far, banning common oil techniques.

Tax on sugary drinks approved in Berkeley; S.F. measure falls short [Los Angeles Times]
In voting Tuesday, Berkeley voters became the first electorate in the nation to approve a tax on sodas and other sugary beverages, while a similar measure in San Francisco fell short. The Berkeley measure levies a penny per ounce for sugar-sweetened beverages sold in the city, including sodas, sports and energy drinks, juices with added sugar, and syrups that go into sugary drinks at cafes, such as Starbucks' Frappuccinos, the measure's backers say. Diet sodas and alcohol won't be taxed under the law. About 75% of Berkeley voters backed Measure D….Though 54.5% of San Francisco voters backed the sugary-drink tax, a tally of 66.67% was needed to pass the measure. The two-thirds threshold was required because the tax revenue would have gone to a special fund for recreation and nutrition programs in schools and parks. The Berkeley measure needed only a majority to pass because that revenue went into the city's general fund.

GMO Labeling: Colorado voters reject food measure; Maui voters approve [National Public Radio]
In the latest bids for states to compel companies to label foods that contain genetically modified ingredients, Colorado voters decided the issue in their state today. Proposition 105, was defeated by a roughly 2-1 margin Tuesday. Oregon voters also considered a measure, but it is still too close to call — the no vote leading the yes vote by two percentage points with more than 80 percent of the vote counted….While more than half of U.S. states have contemplated similar GMO legislation, the only one that has come close to requiring a label is Vermont. The state's law, approved this year, still faces legal challenges, and it's not slated to take effect until 2016. In Hawaii, Maui County voters considered an initiative that went far beyond labeling. By a slim margin, voters decided to temporarily ban genetically engineered crops.

Asian citrus psyllid proposal worries organic farmers [Los Angeles Times]
To combat pests like the Asian citrus psyllid, exotic fruit fly and glassy-winged sharpshooter that threaten the state's food supply, the California Department of Food and Agriculture is weighing a new plan that some organic farmers say doesn't do enough to prevent their crops from being ruined by pesticides. The proposal would streamline the state's response to invasive insects by reducing paperwork and allowing the agency to quickly respond to an outbreak when it orders quarantines, sets traps or, more controversially, sprays pesticides….The plan "lacks adequate consideration of organic agriculture and fails to properly assess the potential impacts on California's organic farmers," said Kelly Damewood, policy director for California Certified Organic Farmers, a certification agency, trade association and foundation representing organic operations throughout North America, including 2,300 members in California….The state, which released the plan in August for public comment, said it would first consider alternatives such as traps or the release of sterile insects. If an emergency does require spraying, the state would consider weather and wind patterns to reduce the risk of pesticide drift on organic farms.

Why farmers aren't cheering this year's monster harvest [National Public Radio]
U.S. farmers are bringing in what's expected to be a record-breaking harvest for both corn and soybeans. But for many farmers, that may be too much of a good thing. Farmers will haul in 4 billion bushels of soybeans and 14.5 billion bushels of corn, according to USDA estimates. The problem? Demand can't keep up with that monster harvest. Corn and soybean prices have been falling for months. A bushel of corn is now worth under $4 — about half what it was two years ago….Farm machinery companies have noticed. John Deere plans to lay off 1,000 workers at plants in Iowa. Another company, AGCO, says it will cut around 100 jobs in Kansas.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment