Friday, August 15, 2014

Ag Today Thursday, August 7, 2014


Valley officials throw support behind larger water bond [Fresno Bee]
A cross-section of city and county officials, farming and business interests joined together Wednesday at Fresno City Hall to support a multibillion-dollar water bond that's nearly twice as large as what Gov. Jerry Brown wants. The governor this week pledged support for a $6 billion water bond for November's ballot -- but no more -- because of concerns about long-term debt….The water bond event in Fresno was one of two in California on Wednesday. Assembly Minority Leader Connie Conway was among Republican and Democratic lawmakers who stated support to increase funding for water-storage projects at the site of a proposed reservoir in an agricultural valley north of Sacramento….The bond amount is now in negotiations between the state Assembly and Senate leadership and the governor's office, Perea said. It requires two-thirds support from legislators to reach the ballot.

Editorial: Our View: Gov. Brown’s water bond falls far short of what’s needed [Modesto Bee]
So let’s get this straight. It’s OK with the governor to spend $9.95 billion for a bullet train that will speed from Los Angeles to San Francisco, but he can’t fathom spending a penny more than $6 billion to provide more water for all 36 million Californians and a $45 billion ag industry that is literally begging for it….But more than we need fast trains, more than we need better roads, even more than we need better classrooms, we need more water. And if Gov. Jerry Brown isn’t prepared to spend more than $2 billion on creating additional storage, then he isn’t serious about helping us find that water….Bluntly and emphatically, $2 billion is not enough. Not even remotely….There’s still time to negotiate a better water bond. If the governor won’t lead, our legislators must….There must be enough money in this bond to build more storage. Otherwise, it’s just not good enough.

Editorial: Our View: This is the year to make the pitch for Sites [Marysville Appeal – Democrat]
When a small group of state legislators and staff members visited Colusa County on Wednesday, they not only saw the area that will hopefully become Sites Reservoir, but also parched landscape that such a facility would help water….We need voter approval to have the projects move ahead. Now is the year to put this on the ballot — California has inched out of the desperate times of a few years ago, and no one who considers a ballot measure can escape the sights and effects of drought....which could be well mitigated by storage at Sites….One perhaps-sour note was sounded as news of a proposal by Gov. Jerry Brown made the rounds the same day as the tour. Brown is proposing a very lean $6 billion bond plan that would provide some funding for a variety of purposes, including storage. His desire to economize is respected, but we don't think the amount dedicated to storage — perhaps just $2 billion — is adequate to get the job done (certainly not both Sites and Temperance Flat).

Russia bans import of U.S. farm goods, but impact may be small [Sacramento Bee]
U.S. exporters of farm products said Wednesday that they would search for new foreign markets after Russia announced a one-year retaliatory agricultural trade ban as punishment for financial sanctions imposed by the United States and Europe….California nut growers are also affected. Russia bought more than $425 million worth of tree nuts in 2012, and about $143.7 million of that came from U.S. exporters of almonds and pistachios, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture….The largest U.S. almond exporter, Blue Diamond Growers of Sacramento, Calif., didn’t wait for the sanctions. It started turning down business in Russia months ago after the border dispute between Russia and the Ukraine turned violent. The company stopped selling to Russia about six months ago. “We don’t wait for the government. There are other people who want our almonds, plenty of demand,” said Susan Brauner, director of public affairs for the cooperative to which more than half of California growers belong.

Surveys show Valley songbird in decline [Stockton Record]
The dwindling tricolored blackbird, an iconic Central Valley songbird, will have to wait a while longer for protection as a threatened or endangered species…."The results suggest that the species is in precipitous decline," said Michael Sutton, president of the state Fish and Game Commission….Still, the commission was unwilling to bypass its normal process and grant the blackbird expedited protection under the state's Endangered Species Act. Commissioners decided to wait until a formal petition is filed, with the understanding they may reconsider emergency action next spring, before crop harvests threaten additional birds….Environmentalists and bird advocates support emergency protections but agricultural groups spoke out against them Wednesday, saying they would harm landowners and that voluntary efforts should continue. "Showing up with a gun and a badge on a dairy does not engender cooperation and conservation of a species," said Noelle Cremers with the California Farm Bureau Federation.

Imperial County Farm Bureau offers burrowing owl nesting box workshop [Imperial Valley Press]
…While 70 percent of California's burrowing owl population makes its home in the Imperial Valley, they're still considered a species of special concern. It is illegal to hunt, capture or kill burrowing owls. Even possessing one of their feathers is against the law. So, when they take over burrows next to concrete canals, in ditch banks and drains, they have to be encouraged to vacate those burrows and move to areas where they won't interfere with irrigators….One easy way to do so is to build an artificial burrow not far from the inhabited location, and then lock them out. It's a simple operation, according to Marie Barrett, a biologist with Barrett’s Biological Surveys. Barrett taught an Imperial County Farm Bureau workshop on how to do just that July 29 at the Meloland Field Station in Holtville.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment