Monday, August 19, 2013

Ag Today Thursday, August 8, 2013




Plan to release water from Trinity Dam angers farmers [San Francisco Chronicle]
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, fearing a giant fish die-off if something is not done to improve river flows, approved the release of water from Trinity Dam into the Klamath River Wednesday to the dismay of farmers, who have threatened to sue. The bureau's decision will allow 62,000 acre-feet of cold Trinity River water to be released into the Klamath between Aug. 15 and Sept. 21 to help spawning chinook salmon. An acre-foot is enough to cover an acre of land in a foot of water - about 326,000 gallons. Officials with the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority, representing agricultural interests in the Central Valley who rely on the Trinity water, said the decision has forced them to consider filing a lawsuit to stop the release.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

Modesto council to put growth to a vote [Modesto Bee]
The Modesto City Council voted Wednesday to put a proposal on the June ballot that would make it difficult for housing developments to be built on prime agricultural land. The council voted 6-1 to place a residential urban limit developed by farmland advocate and former Councilman Denny Jackman before voters next year. The proposed boundary runs as far north as Kiernan Avenue and west along Highway 99. It would require housing developers who want to build outside the boundary to seek voter approval for their projects. Jackman's proposal allows for housing developments to be built on Modesto's east side, where the farmland is of poorer quality….After the meeting, Jackman said his residential urban limit will be a boon for food and agricultural producers as they expand operations and ship more goods out of the county. Agriculture is a nearly $3.3 billion industry in Stanislaus County, making it the county's top industry.

California milk price dispute shows some accord [Modesto Bee]
The state's dairy farmers and processors have moved a little closer to a compromise on milk prices, while still nipping at each other over the issue. Their tentative deal will be presented at a Sept. 12 hearing before Karen Ross, food and agriculture secretary for Gov. Jerry Brown. The compromise calls for a temporary increase in the minimum amount that processors must pay for milk that's made into cheese, and a separate increase reflecting the value of whey, a cheese byproduct sold to other food companies. The increases would be added to the monthly minimums that long have been set by the California Department of Food and Agriculture. Dairy farmers say milk prices need to rise if they are to cover their feed and other costs and recover from a profit squeeze that started in 2008.

Global warming already having dramatic impacts in California, new report says [San Jose Mercury News]
Rising ocean waters. Bigger and more frequent forest fires. More brutally hot summer days. These aren't the usual predictions about global warming based on computer forecasts. They're changes already happening in California, according to a detailed new report issued Thursday by the California Environmental Protection Agency. Climate change is "an immediate and growing threat" affecting the state's water supplies, farm industry, forests, wildlife and public health, the report says. The 258-page document was written by 51 scientists from the University of California, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, among other agencies and institutions. "Climate change is not just some abstract scientific debate," said California EPA Secretary Matt Rodriquez. "It's real, and it's already here."

Some Democrats waver on immigration [Wall Street Journal]
Every Democrat voted for the Senate's immigration bill when it passed the chamber in June. That unanimous party support isn't likely to be replicated if the House votes on its own immigration effort this fall. In the GOP-controlled House, some Democrats, largely from conservative-leaning districts, are set to bolster the ranks of Republican lawmakers skeptical of the Senate's ideas on immigration. As a small faction within the minority party, they won't likely sway key votes, but amid signs that momentum behind the effort might be flagging, their concerns could put the finish line further out of reach. Like many of their GOP counterparts, hesitant House Democrats worry about how to handle the 11 million illegal immigrants already living in the U.S….Some House Democrats fret that any new immigration laws could repeat what they consider the mistakes of a 1986 law that legalized many illegal immigrants and included measures to stop illegal crossings….The exact number of resistant or fence-sitting House Democrats on immigration is hard to determine. Like many Republicans, some centrist Democrats are reluctant to stake out a firm position before the House strategy is set. House leaders have yet to unveil a bill tackling the issue of legalization, though senior GOP lawmakers are expected to introduce legislation this fall that could include granting citizenship to at least a portion of the population.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

Editorial: Bill distracts from larger task of clean water [Sacramento Bee]
For more than a decade, poor residents of small rural communities in the Central Valley have been drinking water contaminated with arsenic, nitrates and other pollutants. Polluted water continued to flow through people's taps even as the state held onto close to a half billion dollars in federal Safe Drinking Water Act funds that could have been used to provide safe potable water to destitute residents. The California Department of Public Health has recently proposed and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed off on a plan to speed delivery of federal water funds to communities that need it. But not everyone is convinced that the plan will solve the problem.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment