Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Ag Today Monday, August 19, 2013


Judge's ruling could bring Valley's high-speed rail project to screeching halt [Fresno Bee]
A Sacramento County Superior Court judge's decision late Friday has the potential to halt construction of California's high-speed rail project before it starts. After considering a lawsuit filed almost two years ago by Kings County and two of its residents, Judge Michael Kenny determined that a funding plan adopted by the California High-Speed Rail Authority in 2011 violated several provisions of Proposition 1A, a $9.9 billion bond measure approved by voters in 2008….But Kenny's ruling also asks for more arguments from both sides before he determines whether to issue a court order to overturn the rail agency's plan or to negate the state Legislature's approval last summer of about $2.6 billion from Prop. 1A for construction to begin.

What's ailing America's cattle? [Wall Street Journal]
A growing number of cattle arriving for slaughter at U.S. meatpacking plants have recently shown unusual signs of distress. Some walked stiffly, while others had trouble moving or simply lay down, their tongues hanging from their mouths. A few even sat down in strange positions, looking more like dogs than cows.…With few other changes to animals' diets that could trigger such symptoms, Dr. Grandin and other scientists involved with the livestock industry began to suspect a tie to weight-gain supplements called beta-agonists that have only recently become widely used. On Friday, drug maker Merck & Co. said it would temporarily suspend sales of Zilmax, one such feed additive, responding to widening animal-welfare concerns within the U.S. beef industry over the use of pharmaceuticals in meat production.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

Shipping continued after computer inspection system failed at meat plants [New York Times]
A troubled new computer system used by inspectors at the nation’s 6,500 meatpacking and processing plants shut down for two days this month, putting at risk millions of pounds of beef, poultry, pork and lamb that had left the plants before workers could collect samples to check for E. coli bacteria and other contaminants.…Agriculture Department officials, who acknowledge that the system failed nationwide on Aug. 8, played down the threat to public safety and insisted that the breakdown of the $20 million computer system had not compromised the nation’s meat supply. Neither the Agriculture Department nor the meat inspectors could point to any examples of contaminated beef or poultry getting into the hands of consumers. The shutdown of the system is only the latest in a series of computer troubles affecting some 3,000 federal meat inspectors who are using the new technology….The new inspection system was supposed to be a significant improvement over older methods that the Agriculture Department had used for decades.

Editorial: Delta tunnel project still stuck with unacceptable baggage [Sacramento Bee]
…If state and federal officials hope to salvage BDCP, they need to come up with solutions that reduce the project's impact, as opposed to transferring that impact elsewhere. And while it may be too late to build any kind of trust with stakeholders in the Delta and Northern California, there are steps they could take to reduce the mistrust. One big step would be to specify, in greater detail, exactly how this project would be operated in different situations….Only that kind of specificity – along with decisions on how much water is needed for Delta flows to help fish – will put upstream water users at ease, or at least alarm them less.

Editorial: Farm-fed economy [Stockton Record]
Anyone who doubts the importance of agriculture to this county should take a look at the recently released report on last year's farm production. It's stunning….Impressive as the raw numbers are, they hardly tell the whole story. Agriculture up and down the Valley is the ballast for county economies that too often lack diversity. San Joaquin County is luckier than most in that sense, owing to our proximity to the Bay Area and Sacramento, but farming remains this county's No. 1 industry. It plugged along with relatively strong production numbers - although slipping back in 2009 and 2010 - even as the Great Recession was costing many residents their homes and jobs. Ag production also is important for what it means to those not involved in farming. It means money….To be sure, some agriculture work can be low-paying, dirty and dangerous, but those jobs help support an industry that brings a huge amount of stability to the rest of the economy.

Commentary: Not all industrial food is evil [New York Times]
I’VE long wondered how producing a decent ingredient, one that you can buy in any supermarket, really happens. Take canned tomatoes, of which I probably use 100 pounds a year. It costs $2 to $3 a pound to buy hard, tasteless, “fresh” plum tomatoes, but only half that for almost two pounds of canned tomatoes that taste much better. How is that possible? The answer lies in a process that is almost unimaginable in scope without seeing it firsthand. So, fearing the worst — because we all “know” that organic farming is “good” and industrial farming is “bad” — I headed to the Sacramento Valley in California to see a big tomato operation. I began by touring Bruce Rominger’s farm in Winters. With his brother Rick and as many as 40 employees, Rominger farms around 6,000 acres of tomatoes, wheat, sunflowers, safflower, onions, alfalfa, sheep, rice and more. Unlike many Midwestern farm operations, which grow corn and soy exclusively, here are diversity, crop rotation, cover crops and, for the most part, real food — not crops destined for junk food, animal feed or biofuel. That’s a good start.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment