Monday, July 29, 2013

Ag Today Thursday, July 25, 2013




High-speed rail agency accused of stalling on settlement [Fresno Bee]
The Madera County Farm Bureau and other organizations are accusing the California High-Speed Rail Authority of failing to live up to key terms of a legal settlement.…Among the key complaints now: The authority had yet to put up a promised $5 million to establish an agricultural land mitigation fund. That money is supposed to be used to buy conservation easements on farmland in the region to make up for acreage lost to the high-speed rail route. The notice also says the rail authority still owed almost $973,000 promised to cover legal fees for the groups suing the agency.…The letter also states that the authority has not yet named the farm bureaus and other organizations as participants in a Farmland Conservancy Program operated by the Department of Conservation; nor has the agency provided a list of mediators for valuation of farmland to be acquired for the railroad right of way. That mediation panel was supposed to have been established by May 17.

So far, so good for peach harvest [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
Despite a labor scare during spring's peach-thinning period, the first round of harvest appears to be coming along smoothly. However, a different issue might cause problems this year: Smaller sizes….Kulwant Johl of Johl Orchards in Yuba County said he hasn't experienced any labor problems so far this year and said workers may have been freed up because canneries are allowing for more mechanical harvesting this year.…Yuba City Mayor Pro Tem Kash Gill said his father, Jagtar Gill, was wrapping up the early variety harvest this week, and that things have been a little easier because of the mechanized allowance….Farmer Sam Nevis said he has heard of some shortages on crews, but lately, it hasn't been too bad of a problem. With the heat producing smaller fruit, he said, picking with machines makes things easier.

Court petition seeks EPA action on pesticide drift [Associated Press]
Activists have filed another petition to force federal regulators to set safety standards that protect children from pesticides that drift from farm fields into nearby communities. Pesticide Action Network, the United Farmworkers of America and other groups filed the petition Wednesday in San Francisco federal court. It asks a judge to force the Environmental Protection Agency to answer a petition from 2009, which demanded the agency evaluate children's exposures to pesticide drift and adopt no-spray buffer zones around homes, schools, parks and daycare centers.

Growth panel approves expansion of Stanislaus almond acreage [Modesto Bee]
A growth management panel has approved a major expansion of almond farming in Stanislaus County's eastern hills and grasslands, where cattle once grazed. The Stanislaus Local Agency Formation Commission voted 5-0 on Wednesday evening to approve the Oakdale Irrigation District's request to annex 7,296 acres of land east of Oakdale and owned by Trinitas Partners LLC of Menlo Park….The annexation is notable for two reasons: • It's another indicator of the prominent place of almonds in this agricultural county. Almonds made up about 22 percent of the county's $3.28 billion in farm revenues last year. There are more than 150,000 acres of almond trees in the county. • It's a boon for those who believe excess water should stay here and help agriculture. The Stanislaus County Farm Bureau sent LAFCo a letter supporting the annexation.

Editorial: Stanislaus water ordinance, take 2 [Modesto Bee]
…Twenty-eight other counties already have groundwater ordinances, but there are citizens who don't want the government telling them where they can drill a well and what they can do with "their" water. We think "their" belongs in quotes because there is nothing more contentious than arguments over who owns water in California….We think it is time for Stanislaus County to have an ordinance that guides and governs groundwater use. It needs to address immediate concerns but also provide flexibility for the future. Also, water availability needs to be a bigger consideration in land use discussions, and the Board of Supervisors could benefit from having an ongoing water advisory committee, just as it has an Ag Advisory Committee and other advisory bodies.

Editorial: Signs would feed our crop curiosity [San Luis Obispo Tribune]
How many times have you driven past a farm field and asked yourself, “Hmmm, I wonder what’s out there. Celery? Lettuce? Broccoli? Cauliflower?”…Los Osos resident Cindi Huntley has a solution: Farmers and ranchers could post crop identification signs on their property “to educate us locals and tourists,” she suggests in a letter to the editor published Tuesday. We think it’s a great idea. So do the folks at the San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau. In fact, they tried it back in 1998. A small grant paid for the signs and stakes, which were then offered to local growers….But the program didn’t catch on in a big way. However, we believe the time may be ripe to try it again, especially since the “farm to fork” movement — which encourages cooks to use ingredients grown close to home — has inspired fresh interest in agriculture.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment