Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Ag Today Tuesday, May 28, 2013




Farmers' lawsuit over ag waiver thrown out [Stockton Record]
A judge's decision could speed new rules regulating polluted runoff from farms, rules that growers say will be costly and burdensome. Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Timothy M. Frawley last week sided with state water quality officials, finding the environmental reports they prepared supporting the new rules were adequate. Frawley also ruled that temporary rules already in place fail to protect water quality. But he said they can remain until the permanent regulations are written….With the farmers' challenge aside, the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board can proceed with the rules, said Ken Landau, the board's assistant executive officer.

U.S. urges conservation as Colorado River hit by drought [Los Angeles Times]
As a regional drought tightens its grip on the Colorado River, water agency officials, environmentalists, farmers and Indian tribal leaders from the seven states that depend on the river for survival are expected to gather Tuesday for a "moving forward" meeting called by federal officials.…If the trend continues, Lake Powell and Lake Mead, the Colorado River's two giant reservoirs, will be at 45% capacity by year's end, their lowest since 1968.…The strategy to avoid cutbacks, officials said, lies in conserving more water in cities, suburbs and farms without resorting to the political bickering and legal fights that have marked the river's recent history….Officials are expected to form three committees to examine the problem and propose solutions. One will involve municipal water agencies, a second will deal with agriculture interests and a third will address the concerns of environmental groups.

On the front lines of food safety [New York Times]
With piles of fresh strawberries beckoning consumers at markets and stores this season, an alliance of a major retailer, fruit growers and farm workers has begun a program to promote healthy produce and improve working conditions. The initiative, unfolding along neatly planted rows of berries at the Andrew & Williamson Fresh Produce’s Sierra Farm here, is an effort to prevent the types of bacterial outbreaks of salmonella, listeria or E.coli that have sickened consumers who ate contaminated cantaloupes, spinach or other produce….Under the new program, with Andrew & Williamson the first grower to participate, berries sold under the label “Limited Edition,” would carry certification to inform consumers that food safety protocols had been followed and that the workers who harvested the crop were treated fairly.…Costco has agreed to play a major part and pay a little extra for the berries once they are certified.

Bill targeting cheaters at farmers markets is put off another year [Los Angeles Times]
A bill that for the first time would have provided substantial resources for state and county inspectors to keep cheaters out of farmers markets was held by the California Assembly Appropriations Committee on Friday afternoon. That means the bill is effectively dead for the year, leaving the dozens of managers and stakeholders who worked for its passage greatly disappointed….The bill would have required a total expenditure of an estimated $1 million, but would have raised only a little more than $750,000, according to the Appropriations Committee analysis. In order to be passed, a future version of the bill probably will have to close that $250,000 gap.…Dan Best, a lawyer who runs 11 farmers markets in Sacramento County, took the lead in putting together and amending AB 996, working with its sponsor, Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento). Over months of discussions they modified the bill so that it gained support from most of the major market operators, as well as the California Farm Bureau Federation.

Protesters across globe rally against Monsanto [Associated Press]
Protesters rallied in dozens of cities Saturday as part of a global protest against seed giant Monsanto and the genetically modified food it produces, organizers said. Organizers said "March Against Monsanto" protests were held in 52 countries and 436 cities, including Los Angeles where demonstrators waved signs that read "Real Food 4 Real People" and "Label GMOs, It's Our Right to Know."…Monsanto Co., based in St. Louis, said that it respects people's rights to express their opinion on the topic, but maintains that its seeds improve agriculture by helping farmers produce more from their land while conserving resources such as water and energy.

Editorial: Senate immigration bill could benefit U.S. agriculture, too [Washington Post]
… Up to two-thirds of the workforce tending to crops and livestock — at least 1 million current workers — are undocumented, up from a third in the mid-1990s.…Despite their central role in providing the country’s food, they remain subject to harassment, raids and deportation. Farmers and ranchers have complained about this for years, warning that the shortage of native-born workers willing and able to do agricultural work, along with the threats to migrant labor, would put farmers out of business and shift crop production overseas. Their increasingly dire pronouncements have been met by the usual right-wing rhetoric attacking “amnesty” for illegal workers….It’s in no one’s interest to saddle farmers and ranchers with an unstable workforce and labor shortages that threaten the supply of domestically grown crops. The agricultural provisions in the immigration bill would go a good distance toward fixing that. And as part of the overall immigration legislation, it may generate support for the bill from some rural lawmakers who would otherwise oppose it.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Friday, May 24, 2013




New rules for labeling meat go into effect in US [Associated Press]
Shoppers in the U.S. will soon have more information about where their meat comes from after new federal labeling rules went into effect Thursday. The rules require labels on steaks, ribs and other cuts of meat to say where the animal was born, raised and slaughtered. Earlier U.S. Department of Agriculture rules only required that countries of origin to be noted, so a package might say "Produce of U.S. and Canada." Now, the label will specify "Born in Canada, raised and slaughtered in the United States." The new rules apply only to cuts of meat such as steaks and roasts, not to ground meat. The USDA has required country of origin labels on seafood since 2005 and on meat and other products since 2009. The new rules for meat are meant to bring the U.S. in line with World Trade Organization standards after the organization determined the old labels discriminated against livestock imported from Canada and Mexico.

A year later, U.S. trade with Colombia grows while anxiety mounts [McClatchy Tribune News Service]
At the Colombian Embassy in Washington, Ambassador Carlos Urrutia says there’s no doubt that his country’s trade deal with the U.S. has paid off: Colombian businesses are sending more socks and cosmetics to California, beet sugar to New York and glass to Florida to help with hurricane repairs. U.S. officials are equally excited, saying U.S. businesses have improved their sales to the South American country by 20 percent. Manufacturers are exporting more transportation equipment, petroleum and coal products, processed foods and a long list of farm products, including soybeans, pork, wheat, grapes and dairy goods. But a year after the agreement took effect, the growth in trade is producing mounting anxiety in some quarters. In California, for example, progress has come with a price for the once-dominant flower industry: Colombian imports have jumped 7 percent in the past year. Less than 3 percent of the Valentine’s Day roses sold in this country were grown here. On New Year’s Day, just two of the 41 floats in the popular Rose Parade in Pasadena, Calif., featured flowers grown in the Golden State.…The unhappiness extends well beyond flowers. Opponents note that the balance of trade between the countries remains out of whack: The United States imported nearly $25 billion in goods from Colombia last year, while it exported only $16 billion.

U.S. Senate votes to cut insurance subsidies to rich farmers [Reuters]
The wealthiest 20,000 U.S. farmers should pay more for taxpayer subsidized crop insurance, the Senate voted on Thursday, adopting a measure that blended deficit reduction, populism and farm program reform. Senators approved the amendment by a lopsided 59-33 vote, in defiance of Agriculture Committee leaders. The move would save $1.3 billion over a decade by reducing the premium subsidy for growers with more than $750,000 of adjusted gross income. Crop insurance, which pays out if farmers' crops are damaged, is the costliest part of the farm safety net, costing $9 billion a year. It would expand by 5 percent in the Senate bill even as other farm, conservation and nutrition programs are cut by $24 billion over 10 years….The Senate approved a similar adjusted gross income limit to the 2012 farm bill that died in the House in an election-year gridlock. Passage of the amendment marked the first time in a week of debate that senators overrode Stabenow's advice on the terms of the farm bill.

Wine industry optimistic despite labor, import concerns [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
It’s a time of optimism in the wine industry, with vintners buying vineyards to secure supply, and grape growers and brokers easily selling their crop for hearty prices. But there are issues on the horizon, including a dwindling labor pool and an increase in bulk wine imports from overseas that could ease pricing pressures on domestic grapes and wine. These trends were part of wide-ranging discussions Thursday among 200 vineyard, winery and finance executives at the 18th annual Vineyard Economics Seminar in Napa. Nearly 98 percent of growers and vintners were more profitable last year than the previous year, and 87 percent believe that next year will be even better, according to an annual survey of wine executives….Growers in some parts of California are experiencing a shortage of agricultural workers. On the Central Coast, some vineyard owners have been accused of stealing farm workers from other crews, said Steve McIntyre, founder of Monterey Pacific, a vineyard management company in the Central Coast.

Editorial: On genetically engineered food, let the market decide [Los Angeles Times]
The movement to force the labeling of genetically engineered food is gaining momentum. In November 2012, an initiative to require the labels in California was on the ballot; it was defeated. Now, federal legislation carried by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) would mandate labeling most bioengineered food nationwide. Yet the movement's argument is weakened by the lack of evidence that inserting fragments of DNA into crops harms our health. Pro-labeling activists — who also tend to be anti-Monsanto activists — point to polls finding that most Americans want the information labeled. But there is plenty about our food that consumers might like to know that is not on the labels…. There are justified concerns about genetically engineered foods. Some have contributed to the rise of pesticide-resistant weeds and been linked to the decimation of monarch butterfly populations in the Midwest. In addition, because the crops' DNA is owned and controlled by the companies that produce them, such as Monsanto, tough questions should be asked about the risks of having so much of the country's food supply owned by a couple of companies. Some 85% or more of the corn and soybeans grown in the United States is genetically modified. But consumers who want to avoid bioengineered foods have many ways of accomplishing that. Organic food is by definition not genetically engineered. Some producers of cornstarch and other products offer, and label, non-engineered versions for a higher price. Trader Joe's has announced that all of the foods sold under its brand name are not sourced from bioengineered crops, and there are websites and apps devoted to selecting non-engineered foods. If there is a growing demand for such foods, the market will find a way to offer them.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Thursday, May 23, 2013




Allies of immigration bill aim for added support [New York Times]
After its solid bipartisan approval in committee, broad legislation to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws was headed Wednesday to the Senate floor, where supporters of the plan were already mobilizing to bring more Republicans on board by focusing on strengthening border security provisions in the bill. The push to expand Republican support poses new challenges for the bipartisan group of eight senators who drafted the original bill, as it puts pressure on Latino and other major immigration advocacy groups to make concessions on border security. Democrats and pro-immigration organizations fear that further changing the delicate border compromise could indefinitely delay legal status for 11 million immigrants already in the country — one of the key components of the bill….In the Republican-controlled House, Republican leaders were leaving several options open. A bipartisan group is also working in the House and has said it will introduce a bill by early June. But on Wednesday Representative Robert W. Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, held a hearing to examine the Senate bill, which he opened with a blunt rejection of its security provisions. Mr. Goodlatte echoed the call from Mr. Rubio for big changes in the border plans.

Scientists visit Fresno to discuss San Joaquin Valley water woes [Fresno Bee]
At a rare Fresno meeting of the 125-year-old Geological Society of America, Sanger hydrologist David Cehrs linked city growth to an expanding water crisis in the San Joaquin Valley. "There will be no winners, only losers. Nobody is going to like it," Cehrs told fellow scientists, students and academics in downtown Fresno on Wednesday….Geology professor C. John Suen of Fresno State said the Sierra snowpack -- the frozen storage for more than half of the area's water -- will decrease by 70% to 90% by the end of the century as the climate warms. The Valley will have to adjust to more rainfall and earlier snowmelt.…From his investigation of water use here, Cehrs has concluded that as the population expands and replaces farming, the underground water table will drop farther. The sinking underground water table will force some tough decisions about how land is used in the Valley. "You can grow people, or you can grow crops," Cehrs said. "But you can't grow both."

WAPA will pay for removing trees [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
A federal agency wants farmers to clear orchard trees lying beneath its power lines, and it's willing to pay them to do so. The Western Area Power Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Energy, is pursuing a plan calling for the clearing of orchard trees within its easement. Farmers can receive compensation for trees chopped down voluntarily if they participate in a buyout program. Depending on how much life is left in the trees, farmers can receive hundreds of thousands of dollars in compensation in some instances, said lands team lead Steve Webber.

Valley leaders brainstorm ways to bring in tourists [Modesto Bee]
…The five counties from San Joaquin to Fresno accounted for only 3 percent of the state's $102 billion in tourist spending in 2011, according to Dean Runyan Associates Inc., a consulting firm. But possibilities abound, speakers said: Some 10 million people live within 100 miles of the region, and many of them want to see its farms, rivers, reservoirs and other attractions. Penny Leff, agritourism coordinator at the University of California at Davis, said this kind of enterprise is fairly new but promising. Visitors could spend an hour or two at a corn maze or pumpkin patch, or they could stay overnight at a farm or ranch.…She urged county planning departments to not impede such efforts with excessive rules or permit fees. She said farmers need to let their insurance companies know that visitors are coming — and not let them drive tractors or climb ladders.

'Foodies' spark reawakening of Grange in California [Sacramento Bee]
From exclusive Marin to tony Malibu, young food activists are sparking the renaissance of an old fraternal order – the California Grange. The state Grange still abides by its symbolic Civil War-era ceremonies, but in its modern-day role, it's become home to food literacy activists, food insecurity worriers and food sovereignty supporters. Not to mention the slow food devotees who, in turn, support the small organic farmers and local produce purveyors….On the national stage, however, Grange membership is still dropping. Unlike its California chapter, the National Grange lobbies for big agriculture; it supports the use of pesticides and genetically modified crops. The positions espoused by the state Grange have put it at odds with the national organization. The National Grange revoked the California State Grange's charter in April and filed suit in Sacramento Superior Court to try to force the state Grange to cease operation. The case is pending.

Editorial: County board's non intervention on logging rules recognizes best forest practices [Santa Cruz Sentinel]
The decision by the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors to not take a stand on how the state wants to regulate timber harvests for smaller property owners marked a shift in how the county board has in recent years swung its ax. The bill, pending in the state Legislature, would give a break to small landowners who practice sustainable harvesting on parcels up to 15,000 acres -- an expansion of the acreage for nonindustrial timber harvesting from 2,500….Thinning trees is part of responsible forest management. Yes, timber companies make money on harvesting trees on private properties, but so what? Local companies such as Big Creek have a long record of responsible harvesting and conservation. In addition, the state Department of Forestry is charged with regulating logging -- an agency that has professional foresters on staff to review logging plans. Most of the parcels in Santa Cruz County zoned for timber production are small -- but the cost of producing a harvest plan has been prohibitively large. This bill rightfully will change that.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

Ag Today Wednesday, May 22, 2013




Immigration bill clears hurdle in Senate [Los Angeles Times]
A sweeping bipartisan plan to overhaul the nation's immigration system headed to the Senate floor after a key committee approved it Tuesday, setting the stage for a debate next month that could lead to the biggest victory for advocates of immigrant rights in a generation.…The bill faces weeks of debate in the Senate. Both Democrats and Republicans will seek to undo some of the compromises in the bill, and GOP opponents may yet try to sink it. An even tougher challenge lies ahead in the House, where members of the Republican majority have been less interested than their Senate counterparts in a comprehensive revamping of immigration policy. The Senate Judiciary Committee approved the bill, 13 to 5, with three Republicans joining the majority Democrats. A last-minute deal persuaded one GOP senator to join the two Republicans who had helped draft the bill, but the other Republicans remained adamantly opposed. The bill would provide a path to citizenship for people who came into the country illegally or overstayed visas, so long as they entered before December 2011. They must get provisional status, show a viable income, pay back taxes, fees and fines, and learn English. They can gain permanent legal status in 10 years and apply for citizenship in 13 years. The process is half as long for agricultural workers who commit to jobs in the fields and adults who were brought to the country as minors but serve in the military or attend college.

Senate votes to make small cut to food stamps [Associated Press]
The Senate voted Tuesday to keep a $400 million annual cut — or roughly a half of 1 percent — to the food stamp program as part of a major five-year farm bill.…The Senate Agriculture Committee included the small cut in its version of the farm bill in an effort to appease the House Republicans and also to end what its chairwoman, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said was a misuse of the program. The Senate bill would target states that give people who don't have heating bills very small amounts of heating assistance so they can automatically qualify for higher food stamp benefits.…Resolving the differences on food aid, now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, between the two chambers will be key to passage of the massive five-year farm bill that lawmakers are attempting to push through for the third year in a row. The far-reaching bill costs almost $100 billion annually and would set policy for farm subsidies, rural programs and the food aid. The House version of the farm bill would cut $2 billion a year, or a little more than 3 percent, from the food aid program, which has more than doubled in cost since 2008.

Survey: Cost is barrier to sustainable farming [Salinas Californian]
The biggest barrier to Salinas Valley growers not adopting more environmentally friendly practices is the initial costs involved, according to a newly released survey of specialty crop growers in California. Ed Thompson, the California director for the American Farmland Trust, which conducted the survey, said growers here are more wary of getting involved with the government than their counterparts in the Midwest farmlands.…In the focus groups, the trust learned that growers here would prefer financial assistance through a tax credit for investing in what the trust calls environmentally beneficial management practices. There are existing tax deductions available, but deductions only lower the taxable income. Tax credits, on the other hand, would allow growers to lower their tax obligations penny for penny what they invested in start-up costs.…The second biggest concern for growers, according to the survey, is what happens if they adopt more environmentally beneficial practices and their yields tumble and subsequently their incomes.

Pesticides make a comeback [Wall Street Journal]
Insecticide sales are surging after years of decline, as American farmers plant more corn and a genetic modification designed to protect the crop from pests has started to lose its effectiveness. The sales are a boon for big pesticide makers, such as American Vanguard Corp. and Syngenta AG. But it has sparked fresh concerns among environmental groups and some scientists that one of the most widely touted benefits of genetically modified crops—that they reduce the need for chemical pest control—is unraveling. At the same time, the resurgence of insecticides could expose both farmers and beneficial insects to potential harm….Monsanto said it continues to recommend that farmers rotate their fields from corn to other crops, such as soybeans, which "breaks the rootworm cycle." The St. Louis company also said it and other companies are selling seeds with more than one rootworm-resistant trait. Scientists have confirmed rootworm resistance only to the Monsanto seed that includes just one rootworm trait. Monsanto is phasing out that seed in favor of a multiple-trait version. And Monsanto says it is developing new technology to fight rootworms, which it hopes to put on the market by the end of the decade.
*Link may require paid subscription; text included in attached Word file.

Santa Cruz County won't oppose timber bill [Santa Cruz Sentinel]
The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday declined to weigh in on a controversy over whether to ease regulatory burdens on timberland owners. Under a bill pending at the state Legislature, a program aimed at giving a break to small landowners who practice sustainable harvesting would be expanded to parcels up to 15,000 acres. While the bill has the backing of conservation groups, local environmentalists and water agencies want the Santa Cruz Mountains carved out from the expansion. But with a 4-1 vote, the county board declined to take up the issue, letting stand an earlier decision not to oppose the bill.…Backers of the bill include the Land Trust of Santa Cruz County, the Farm Bureau of Santa Cruz County, Big Creek Lumber and Redwood Empire.… The bill expands, from 2,500 acres to 15,000 acres, an existing statewide program for small landowners that allows them to draw up one-time management plans for sustainably harvested timberlands. At up to $60,000 or more, those plans both cost more and are more thorough than regular timber harvest plans, but only have to be approved once.

Eureka City Council adopts mariculture project resolution [Eureka Times-Standard]
The Eureka City Council voted 4-1 on Tuesday, with Mayor Pro Tem Mike Newman dissenting, to adopt a resolution directing the city of Eureka to move forward on a project with the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District that would allow the expansion of shellfish operations in Humboldt Bay. Following the presentation on a proposed Humboldt Bay mariculture pre-permitting project, Newman said he supports the project and understands that part of the future of Humboldt Bay is the mariculture industry, but believes the council needs more information before a resolution is made.…According to the proposed project, the harbor district would take on the responsibility of getting the necessary permits and permissions needed to farm pre-permitted sites in Humboldt Bay and would then lease areas out to shellfish growers through a bidding process, harbor district Director of Conservation Dan Berman said….The existing local shellfish industry employs 50 to 60 people and earns $7 to $8 million in annual revenue, according to Berman.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.