Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Ag Today Thursday, September 20, 2012



Farm-state lawmakers returning home empty-handed [San Luis Obispo Tribune]
Farm-state members of Congress have campaigned for decades on the back of farm bills delivering election-season subsidies and other goodies to rural voters. Not this year. The bill is stalled, primarily because House GOP leaders don't want a noisy fight over food stamps this close to the election. That poses a particular problem for some Republicans in tight races for the Senate or the House who will go home empty-handed when Congress adjourns this week…. It is unclear how angry rural voters will be about the lack of a farm bill. The farm economy has been strong in recent years, and expiration won't mean an immediate loss of benefits for most farmers. But farm-state members argue that the certainty of federal policy is necessary for farmers making their annual business plans this fall and approaching bankers for loans. Punting the bill may also mean less money overall. While both chambers' versions of the bill would save tens of billions of dollars from current spending, the agriculture committees may be asked to save even more as budgets tighten further next year.

Feds approve first leg of Calif. high-speed rail [Associated Press]
The Federal Railroad Administration gave its approval Wednesday for construction on the first phase of California's high-speed rail system, clearing the final technical hurdle for construction to start next year on a 65-mile span from Merced to Fresno. The decision supports the California High-Speed Rail Authority's so-called hybrid alternative, which state officials say is the least costly approach and the one that is least harmful to the environment. Rail authority Chief Executive Officer Jeff Morales said the federal decision will allow the project to break ground next year….The project still faces significant legal challenges that could delay next year's planned construction start. Groups representing Central Valley farmers claim in lawsuits that the state failed to conduct thorough environmental reviews, as required by California law. "We're not seeking necessarily to stop the project entirely, but we do think the project should be stopped until some of these environmental issues, and their severity, are addressed," said Anja Raudabaugh, executive director of the Madera County Farm Bureau.

Oakdale Irrigation District sets vote on selling water [Modesto Bee]
The board of the Oakdale Irrigation District plans an Oct. 2 vote on the tentative terms of a water sale to the city of Brisbane. That was the outcome of the first public discussion of the sale Tuesday — the same day the Modesto Irrigation District dropped its contentious proposal to sell water to San Francisco, which lies right next to tiny Brisbane. The OID would sell up to 2,400 acre-feet from its Stanislaus River supply each year, according to a "term sheet" discussed by the board. This would come out of the roughly 40,000 acre-feet the OID has available because two previous water transfers — to Stockton-area domestic users and to river fishery flows — have ended.

Editorial: Modesto Irrigation District's problems won't evaporate [Modesto Bee]
While the Modesto Irrigation District has ended negotiations with San Francisco about the sale of water, the bigger issue has not evaporated — the need to repair, upgrade and modernize the irrigation system that nurtures our bountiful agriculture industry. While it's tempting to let this whole debate fade into mist — and be thankful for a break in the relentless name calling and conflict — the district should not wait too long before starting fresh on identifying the needed projects and, just as important, identifying the options to pay for them. Water sales should not be ruled out as a source of revenue, but should be thoroughly investigated as part of a larger strategy. And farmers will have to pay more. They cannot expect electricity customers to continue subsidize the water system….The starting point on which all should agree: Water is the lifeblood of our biggest industry, agriculture, but also essential to urban residents and to businesses. We inherited a vast treasure from our predecessors in the form of secure rights to a lot of Tuolumne River water. We have to make the best and most efficient use of that water through a distribution system that is always reliable and not wasteful.

Businesses plead for changes to California's new cap-and-trade market [Sacramento Bee]
Heavyweight business groups are staging a last-ditch protest against California's new cap-and-trade carbon market, demanding changes to a program they've labeled a job killer. Manufacturers, oil refiners and others are lining up to testify today before the California Air Resources Board, which will run the carbon market. Their goal: To get the Air Resources Board to reduce the costs of participating in the market. The program is set to begin Nov. 14, when the state agency will auction off millions of carbon emission allowances….The manufacturers' group, along with the California Chamber of Commerce, California Business Roundtable and California League of Food Processors, urged Gov. Jerry Brown recently to rewrite the rules of the market.

Almond harvest wrapping up, a little lighter than expectations [Chico Enterprise-Record]
Every year has its surprises, and this year almond growers were expecting a bigger crop for nonpareil nuts, the most popular variety. All seemed perfectly aligned in the spring. The bloom from different varieties overlapped, and the bees looked like they were doing well at pollination, said Joe Connell, UC farm adviser. The weather was good, without rain. But it wasn't quite as bountiful as had been hoped.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

No comments:

Post a Comment