Senate approves $1 billion water plan amid drought [Associated Press]
The
state Senate on Wednesday approved a $1 billion proposal to speed up spending
on water projects and offer some relief to residents and wildlife in
drought-stricken California. The Senate voted 35-1 on a bill accelerating
infrastructure spending, including $660 million on flood protection. An
accompanying measure that authorized fines for illegal water diversions passed
on a 24-14 party-line vote, with Republicans opposed….The emergency legislation
also cracks down on water-guzzling marijuana farms by authorizing state fish
and wildlife officials to fine growers up to $8,000 for illegally taking
water….Republican lawmakers raised concerns about growing government and the
potential for farmers also facing fines. “Every time we do one of these
emergency bills what we really do is expand the authority of the government,”
said Sen. Tom Berryhill, R-Twain Harte.
$700
an acre-foot, but will water be sold? [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
Southern
California water agencies are reportedly offering up to $71 million for
Northern California water, but until local water allocations are final, it's
not known how much, if any, Yuba-Sutter water will be sent south. The
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is the major buyer, and
local rice farmers would be the main willing sellers of the proposed
transfers…. That has raised concerns about impacts to the local economy, as
agriculture props up a number of supporting industries. But many irrigation
districts cap the amount of water that can be transferred, and others have a
no-fallowing policy, both of which mitigate potential economic impacts. Beyond
those constraints, anticipated cuts in the water supply from the State Water
Project and the Central Valley Project could halt the proposed transfers altogether,
said Jim Morris, spokesman for the California Rice Commission.
Op-Ed: Why almond growers
aren't the water enemy [Los Angeles Times]
A
quarter-century ago, when I first started farming the fertile ground of western
Fresno County, my crop was cotton….We were portrayed, with some justification,
as the greedy farmers of Fresno's west side. So my farming partner and I
decided in 1989 to plant our first almond trees on 40 acres outside
Coalinga….But now we're the bad guys again. Article after article in
newspapers, magazines and online put nut growers in a bad light related to the
drought. The whole equation seems to be reduced to a single number wielded by
our critics: It takes one gallon of water to grow one nut. Boy, that sounds
wasteful. It's a figure designed to outrage, and it does the trick. But looking
at the societal value of producing food only by gallons of water used is silly,
if not absurd.
Commission
rejects cities’ demands, OKs farmland formula [Modesto Bee]
The
fight against urban sprawl notched a narrow victory Wednesday, despite
objections from seven of Stanislaus County’s nine cities. The 3-2 vote by
leaders of a growth-guiding agency simply defined one way cities can choose to
help preserve farmland, but was seen by cities as an affront to their land-use
authority. The decision set a formula for figuring how much money cities can
charge developers when paving over farmland for houses or other buildings. The
money can be banked to eventually buy farm conservation easements somewhere
else in the county, preserving one agricultural acre for each one developed.
Agency
takes public comment on forest plan [Redding Record Searchlight]
U.S.
Forest Service officials have decided to do things backward in updating the
Northwest Forest Plan. Typically, when the Forest Service draws up management
plans it creates a draft and then asks the public to comment on it. But this
time, this time the agency wants to hear from the public what needs to be
updated in the plan, why and what it should do differently, as well as anything
else that should be considered, said Randy Moore, the Forest Service’s regional
forester for California….The Northwest Forest Plan was adopted in 1994 to
protect critical habitat of the northern spotted owl while also trying to
maintain a viable forest products industry in the Pacific Northwest, according
to the Forest Service….California national forests affected by the plan include
the Shasta-Trinity, Lassen, Klamath, Six Rivers, Modoc and Mendocino.
Comment: Bring on the guest
workers [Wall Street Journal]
Of
all the words in the English language, none are more debilitating for
Republican debate than these four: “a path to citizenship.”…So if citizenship
is the sticking point, why not start with something that by definition is not
about citizenship: guest workers?...In general, objections to guest workers
boil down to two. The first comes from organized labor, which traditionally
opposes any opening to nonunionized workers….As for abuses, there is a simple
fix: If guest worker visas no longer held them hostage to a single employer—if
they could switch to another job with another approved employer—employers would
have a far greater incentive to treat them right….The other general objection
to guest workers emanates from the conservative side: Some just don’t want
anyone coming in under any circumstances….Guest workers who could go back and
forth across the border freely would have little incentive to overstay their
visas or sneak in their families as those here illegally now do.
Ag
Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm
Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may
not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site
registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more
information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment