Friday, June 13, 2014

Ag Today Thursday, June 12, 2014


Discussion on 100-year-old water rights delayed until July [Modesto Bee]
The State Water Resources Control Board will push back its discussion of curtailing 100-year-old water rights to July 1. The board planned to bring up the controversial issue at its meeting next week, but apparently its staff needs more time to prepare.…Several Northern San Joaquin Valley irrigation districts have water rights dating back before 1914, which is when the state began regulating such things. The water board has indicated it will consider a “resolution regarding drought-related emergency regulations for curtailment of diversions to protect senior water rights.”…The exact wording of what the state water board will consider has not been made public.

Environmental lawsuit filed to stop water transfer package [Chico Enterprise-Record]
A lawsuit was filed Wednesday in federal District Court for the Eastern District of California against the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, stating a proposed package of San Luis and Delta Mendota Water Authority transfers require a full environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act. Sending water from Northern California to other parts of the state has to stop, at least long enough for an environmental review of the long-term impacts, said Barbara Vlamis of Chico's AquAlliance…. Exporting water when outflow to the delta is very low will exposes Delta smelt to "lethal temperatures" and pulls them into delta pumps, where the fish die, said Bill Jennings, director of the Sportfishing Alliance.…The water transfers targeted in the lawsuit are not specific as to buyers and sellers. This is because the transfer package is "programmatic," and individual water transfers will be submitted to the bureau soon, the lawsuit states. The plaintiffs said they believe transfers may begin in early July.

Cantor’s lesson: Hedging on immigration is perilous [New York Times]
The lesson that immigration advocates say they gleaned from Tuesday’s election results is, simply put, that hedging on such an intensely charged issue can be politically fatal. Two very different primaries — one statewide in South Carolina, and one in a gerrymandered Virginia House district that includes parts of Richmond — made that clear. In South Carolina, Senator Lindsey Graham — one of the Republican architects of the bipartisan Senate immigration bill, who openly discussed his support for a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants on the campaign trail — easily fended off six primary challengers to win his party’s nomination. But in Virginia, Representative Eric Cantor, the No. 2 House Republican, lost in a stunning primary upset to a little-known Tea Party challenger after showing some lukewarm support for several more narrow immigration compromises before frantically backpedaling from the issue.

Editorial: Don’t let Cantor’s defeat stop immigration reform [Sacramento Bee]
…Progress on immigration reform was going to be extremely difficult even before Cantor’s loss. Now, reform foes are trying to send the message that crossing them is political suicide. Some Republicans had started to become more open on the immigration issue, realizing that our country is becoming more diverse and their party’s long-term future hangs in the balance. They should not falter now…. Republicans need to recognize that Cantor’s district in the Richmond suburbs is by no means representative of the entire country. Immigration reform advocates point out that Sen. Lindsey Graham, who was also attacked for supporting some changes, easily won his primary Tuesday in South Carolina, a very conservative state.

Opinion: How Imperial County farmers are making air quality better [Imperial Valley Press]
Flying home from a brief trip to Sacramento a couple weeks ago, I was joined on the plane by a man who was new to Imperial Valley. While talking with him, he made the comment about how dirty the air was here in our area and, in his opinion, how farmers contributed to our unhealthy air quality….And then it dawned on me; does he, or the general public, even realize what farmers are doing in their fields to reduce dust and particulate matter (PM10)? As required by the Imperial County Air Pollution Control District Rule 806, agricultural operations are required to reduce the amount of PM10 as a result of emissions generated through implementation of Conservation Management Practices, also known as CMPs, even though farmers contribute a fraction of the overall dust generated.

Editorial: Progress, perhaps [Ventura County Star]
Researchers are reporting some potentially encouraging news for Ventura County’s valuable citrus crops, which face a serious threat from a deadly disease. Scientists at the University of Florida — a state whose multibillion-dollar orange industry has been hard-hit by the same disease — say they’ve found a possible treatment for it….Unfortunately, officials say it will take years to prove the chemical’s effectiveness before it can be put to use in Ventura County, where citrus crops generate more than $500 million a year in economic activity. Yet, even if this discovery is only one step forward, it’s a step in the right direction.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment