Thursday, November 29, 2012

Ag Today Monday, November 26, 2012



More farmers hand over harvests to machines [Sacramento Bee]
Rumbling through an olive orchard, a machine harvester towers over a row of trees, stripping the small green fruit and shooting them into a rapidly filling container. This may be the future of farming in an era of worsening labor scarcity….The dwindling supply of workers has long been on the horizon, but there's a new urgency for farmers to shift to machines to harvest crops around the region and state. Farmers had significant trouble finding people to tend and pick their crops this year, said Bryan Little, director of labor affairs for California Farm Bureau.

Proposed refuge expansion tough sell to S.J. ag interests [Stockton Record]
Expanding the world's largest network of wildlife refuges into San Joaquin County would attract rare and beautiful migratory birds, open up new boating and fishing opportunities, and reduce flood risk in urban areas, federal officials say in a new report. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service says enlarging the San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge is a "unique" opportunity to restore a major corridor of wildlife habitat along the second largest stream in California, and triple the number of refuge visitors in the process. Its plan, however, has already faced criticism here. San Joaquin County supervisors voted last year to oppose the expansion before it had been formally proposed….Now that proposal is on the streets, and the executive director of the San Joaquin Farm Bureau Federation said the federal government does not appear to have addressed local officials' concerns. "You would think they would listen to county supervisors, but they didn't," bureau director Bruce Blodgett said. "It's obvious the public input process isn't what it used to be."

Merced-to-Fresno high-speed rail opponents rethink legal strategy [Fresno Bee]
Stung by a judge's ruling, opponents of California's proposed high-speed rail route between Merced and Fresno are reassessing their legal strategy -- but not their resolve….When Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Timothy Frawley refused on Nov. 16 to block the authority from any planning, land-buying or contracting efforts before construction begins in mid- 2013, he also indicated that the plaintiffs suing the agency may be building their legal case on unstable ground….The judge's remarks "were not lost on us," said Anja Raudabaugh, executive director of the Madera County Farm Bureau. "We're looking at it as a positive thing because we have an opportunity to assess our merits, and how often do you get to do that in a lawsuit?" While not tipping her organization's hand, "we will not be pursuing the same strategy going forward," she said. "The Farm Bureau has made a commitment to see the case through because we believe the merits are so strong."…Farmers north of the San Joaquin River aren't the only ones with a keen interest in the lawsuits. High-speed rail opponents from Kings County also are keeping a close eye on developments, and a handful of them traveled to Sacramento for the Nov. 16 hearing and Frawley's ruling.

Rising electric rates call Modesto, Turlock irrigation pricing into question [Modesto Bee]
An emerging debate over fairness in electricity and irrigation bills might not be getting traction if power hadn't become so expensive. In olden days, power sold by the Modesto and Turlock irrigation districts was relatively cheap. Steep rate increases in recent years have erased the local advantage. Now people are questioning the age-old policy of keeping irrigation fees artificially low by making electricity users pay more. And changes in the law have focused more attention on what's fair….The districts say there are important factors behind keeping water rates reasonable. For starters, water applied to crops slowly seeps down, replenishing underground sources. That's an incredible benefit for which farmers get no credit, both districts say. Farmer and hydrologist Vance Kennedy has figured the value at $14 million per year, computed at the rate that San Francisco might have paid MID for water if a controversial proposed sale had not been abandoned. "If you increase the cost to farmers to where they can't afford (irrigation water), they're going to drill more wells and exacerbate the issue," said Wayne Zipser, executive manager of the Stanislaus County Farm Bureau.

Maker of methyl iodide ends US EPA registration [Associated Press]
The maker of the controversial pesticide methyl iodide, used primarily to fumigate strawberries, has agreed to remove all of its products from the U.S. market and end sales permanently. The U.S. EPA announced Wednesday that Arysta had requested voluntarily cancellation of all of the company's product registrations, which means that the suspected carcinogen will no longer be used in this country by the end of the year. The company's decision ends more than five years of legal battles by environmental groups and farmworkers who had fought initial approval of the product during the Bush administration. It comes after an announcement in March that the Japanese company would voluntarily pull methyl iodine from the U.S. market.

Editorial: A cornucopia of blessings to be thankful for with California's agricultural bounty [Sacramento Bee]
…As we have become more urbanized, most of us have gotten far away from food production. It is easy to take that bounty for granted….California, from the beginning of the American period, has been about large-scale agriculture (not the small family farm of the Midwest or the Plains). The Sacramento Valley, part of the Great Central Valley, was the state's first significant farming region….Economies of scale have made our food affordable and accessible. Americans spend 9.5 percent of our income on what we eat, compared with 14 percent in 1970….Yet amid this bounty, one in eight Californians does not have enough food to eat and many more do not have healthy diets, contributing to obesity. This breadbasket of the nation can do better, and Thanksgiving Day reminds us of that.

Ag Today is distributed to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes, by the CFBF Communications/News Division, 916-561-5550; news@cfbf.com. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address.

No comments:

Post a Comment