Thursday, July 24, 2014

Ag Today Friday, July 18, 2014


River ruling could boost regulation of groundwater [Associated Press]
An attorney said Thursday he expects to appeal a potentially precedent-setting court finding that could make local governments responsible for controlling the largely unregulated pumping of groundwater in the state….Sacramento Superior Court Judge Allen Sumner ruled Tuesday that Siskiyou County had to evaluate the impact of groundwater pumping on the Scott River…."The court ... has fundamentally changed some basic principles of California water law," said Rod Walston, Siskiyou County's attorney in the case. Walston said he expects the county to ask a state appeals court to overturn Sumner's decision….A ruling by the state appeals court on the issue would apply to all counties, the Environmental Law Foundation's James Wheaton, a lead attorney in the case, said.

Farmers fight drought-inspired regulation of groundwater pumping [Sacramento Business Journal]
A report this week from UC Davis researchers highlighted again the threat that drought poses to California's groundwater supply. But farmers and others are at odds about how the state should monitor and regulate use of water pumped from wells. Legislation circulating the Capitol would make California the last of the Western states to impose a regulatory structure around groundwater pumping….Assemblyman Roger Dickinson — author of one such bill — believes recent data on drought-driven economic losses “underscores the immediate necessity of taking legislative action.” But California’s farmers feel that jamming through a regulatory bill could create even greater problems. “This has a potential to impact the agriculture community more than anything we’ve seen in last 30 or 40 years,” said Danny Merkley, director of water resources for the California Farm Bureau Federation.

Lower flows in Russian River sought to protect supply in Lake Mendocino [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
Desperate to save plummeting water reserves in Lake Mendocino, a Mendocino County water agency is lobbying the state to dramatically reduce the amount that must be released downstream into the Russian River for fish and people. Without a change to the current release schedule, and barring a wet fall, the reservoir is set to be nearly dry by the end of the year, Mendocino County water officials said….Officials with the state Water Resources Control Board said Thursday they are considering the request. It comes as Lake Mendocino — the largest reservoir on the upper Russian River and a major summer source of water for fish, residents and farmers along the section of river north of Healdsburg — is at less than 38 percent of capacity, or 42,000 acre-feet. Mandated releases, largely for fish, are causing the lake to lose about 200 acre-feet a day.

PG&E considers options for new high-voltage power lines in Fresno County [Fresno Bee]
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. is asking the public to weigh in on a proposal to build a new high-voltage transmission line across western Fresno County….The utility will hold workshops next week in Fresno, Huron and Mendota to let property owners and residents see where the corridors are, and to field questions and concerns about how the different routes might affect their homes, businesses or farms. The Central Valley Power Connect project -- anticipated to be built in 2018 and 2019 -- is needed to provide enough transmission capacity to meet the region's growing demand for electricity, said Lynsey Paulo, a PG&E spokeswoman….Each of the broad corridors -- determined through evaluating factors like avoiding facilities such as Lemoore Naval Air Station and environmental or wildlife preserves and skewing toward farmland that has been fallowed -- is intended to give PG&E engineers some flexibility to plan a power-line route that is the least disruptive to farms, cities, school districts or other property owners.

When ag and neighborhoods collide [Salinas Californian]
It’s not exactly like living next to a turkey farm, but neighbors in a bulge of south Salinas that abuts fields voiced unease and even anger this week during a forum that highlighted problems with living across the street from major commercial agricultural enterprises. Members of the Los Olivos Riker Neighborhood Association sponsored Monday’s forum with the goal of connecting residents with their very close farming neighbors….Nicole Capps, the president of the association, invited Monterey County Farm Bureau Executive Director Norm Groot to update residents on “what’s going on in ag.” Roughly two dozen residents attended to get a better understanding of one of their main concerns: pesticide applications, Capps said. Other concerns included labor, noise, fertilizer application and dust generated from farming operations.

Commentary: Legislature must protect public health on antibiotics and livestock [Sacramento Bee]
California should be at the forefront of protecting public health by ending the use of antibiotics on animals that are not sick. We applaud the Legislature for tackling the issue this year, but we’re troubled that it is pushing through a bill that will bring little change instead of a measure that would have a real impact….Instead, currently on the table is Senate Bill 835, by Sen. Jerry Hill, that would simply put into law weaker Food and Drug Administration guidelines that were announced last year. Yes, SB 835 would ban the use of antibiotics for growth promotion, but it would leave open a glaring loophole. Many of the antibiotics used for growth promotion are also used for disease prevention, making the bill simply a label change for the pharmaceutical industry. If the Legislature is serious about tackling this problem, it must pass a bill that limits the use of the antibiotics to only treating sick animals.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

Ag Today Thursday, July 17, 2014


Sacramento judge makes precedent-setting ruling on groundwater [Capital Public Radio, Sacramento]
A Sacramento Superior Court judge issued a ruling Tuesday requiring regulation of groundwater pumping to protect a river in Siskiyou County. Attorneys on both sides say it's the first time a California court has ruled the "public trust doctrine" applies to groundwater. The doctrine says the State of California holds all waterways for the benefit of the people. The lawsuit claimed groundwater pumping in the Scott River Basin is partly responsible for decreased river flows - limiting the public's use of the river and harming fish habitat….Attorney Rod Walston represents Siskiyou County….He said the trial court ruling will likely be appealed and the final decision may be made by the California Supreme Court.

Valley districts blamed for ignoring water conservation law [Center for Investigative Reporting]
After largely ignoring a conservation law passed during the last drought, some of California's largest agricultural water districts are facing a lawsuit that would force them to measure how much water farmers use. The 2009 law was designed to push the state's biggest water users to conserve by closely monitoring their use. Then, the state's agricultural water districts are supposed to charge the farmers, at least in part, based on that use….The Environmental Law Foundation, an Oakland nonprofit, sent letters Friday to managers of nearly two dozen districts that the state listed as not following the law….Water managers at the agricultural districts in question say they're already using water efficiently and the drought is forcing them to be even more careful. "We comply with the vast majority of what the law requires. We just haven't filed some paperwork to document it," said Robert Kunde, engineer-manager for the Wheeler Ridge-Maricopa Water Storage District in Bakersfield.

Editorial: Overwatering is a crime – except for state’s biggest water user [Sacramento Bee]
California hasn’t quite come to threatening unrepentant water wasters with time in the big house. But emergency rules adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board Tuesday do take the state a lot closer to criminalizing the squandering of a precious resource. It’s an unpleasant but necessary measure….But it is frustrating that agriculture has been let off the hook…In fact, the ag industry has put an even greater burden on the state’s dwindling water supplies by overdrafting groundwater to sustain water-sucking permanent crops like almonds and growing alfalfa for export. Many water-conscious farmers have adopted voluntary conservation measures and should be commended, but they are the exceptions.

Court documents reveal probe into complaints by Mexican forest laborers [Sacramento Bee]
The alleged, two-year-old agreement between the workers in Hidalgo, Mexico, and an Oakley, Idaho, firm called Pure Forest LLP is outlined in federal court documents filed in Sacramento and unsealed Tuesday. The documents – search warrant affidavits compiled by investigators from the departments of Homeland Security and Labor – reveal a criminal probe unearthing evidence that the men allegedly ended up as virtual prisoners in forests north of Sacramento, where authorities contend they were forced to work seven days a week, sleep in tents on the ground, subsist on rotten food for which they were charged as much as $120 a week, and left to drink tainted water from a nearby creek….Lawyers for the owners of Pure Forest sharply dispute the allegations, saying they are untrue, came from “a few disgruntled former employees” and ballooned into a federal probe in which the company is cooperating.

57,000 Reasons immigration overhaul may be stalled for now [New York Times]
The crisis on the border with Mexico is rapidly overtaking President Obama’s plans to use executive action to reshape the nation’s immigration system, forcing him to confront a new set of legal, administrative and political complications. The influx of 57,000 migrant children from Central America is leading Mr. Obama to crack down on deportations at the moment he was preparing to allow more people who are in the country illegally to stay. Although White House officials insist that Mr. Obama has no intention of backing down on his public pledge to use executive orders to “fix as much of our immigration system as I can,” they acknowledge that the crisis has made it much harder….On Wednesday evening, senior administration officials held a briefing on the border surge for all 100 senators as new polls showed large majorities of Americans disapprove of the way Mr. Obama is handling the border crisis, even as support grows for a broader immigration overhaul.

What's really behind the suit to overturn California's foie gras ban? [Los Angeles Times]
Thirteen states have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review California’s ban on foie gras, arguing that it is unconstitutional for the state to pass laws that might interfere with agricultural practices in other states. But the only state that still has foie gras farms -- New York -- was not among those complaining….A closer look at the states involved in the suit might give some hints. Among them are Iowa, Missouri and Kansas, which are among the top 10 pork-producing states in the country; Kansas, Missouri, Oklahoma and Montana, which are among the top 10 beef-producing states; and Georgia, Alabama and South Carolina, which are among the top 10 poultry producers….Supporters of the ban say that while those states may not care so much about foie gras, they may be worried that Golden State voters will next crack down on feed lots or some other aspect of livestock production. They say the current suit is nothing more than a preemptive strike against further animal rights legislation.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

Ag Today Wednesday, July 16, 2014


UC details drought's fiscal impact on state [Stockton Record]
University of California researchers now expect California's drought to cost the state's agricultural industry $2.2 billion in crop losses and higher costs and wipe out 17,000 seasonal and part-time farm-related jobs. An updated study released Tuesday estimates the drought will reduce surface water supplies by 6.6 million acre-feet, with an acre-foot being the amount of water needed to cover an acre of land in one foot of water. But that has been largely offset by new wells and increased pumping of underground aquifers, producing 5 million acre-feet of additional groundwater….Even more should be done, said Paul Wenger, California Farm Bureau Federation president, who advocated development of additional water storage facilities. "We have not planned for the people we have in California today, let alone planned for the people we're going to have in 2030, let alone planned for any climate change that may be coming," he said Tuesday while on a trip to Washington, D.C. Wenger, who grows almonds and walnuts near Modesto, said he fears the UC Davis study underestimates the toll the drought may take through the rest of this summer and fall.

California approves forceful steps amid drought [New York Times]
With rainfall this year at historically low levels and reservoirs quickly dwindling, California officials on Tuesday approved the most drastic measures yet to reduce water consumption during the state’s increasingly serious drought, including fines of up to $500 per day under some circumstances for watering a garden, washing a car or hosing down a sidewalk. The new measures come in response to an apathetic public that has ignored repeated pleas to save water since Gov. Jerry Brown declared a statewide drought emergency in January. Though the governor asked all Californians to reduce their water consumption by 20 percent, water use actually increased by 1 percent statewide in May, according to a state survey released Tuesday. “People really don’t understand the gravity of the drought, particularly in urban California, where people are hundreds of miles from their water source,” said Felicia Marcus, chairwoman of the State Water Resources Control Board, which voted on Tuesday to impose the new regulations. They are expected to take effect around Aug. 1….The drought has already pummeled farmers in California, which is home to the nation’s largest agricultural sector….Ms. Marcus said that California could not count on the drought’s letting up, and that it was important to increase conservation measures right away.

Board expands water curtailment powers; New regulations exempt pre-1914 rights holders but make orders immediately enforceable [Colusa Sun-Herald]
New emergency drought regulations adopted on July 2 will give the State Water Resources Control Board's executive director the authority to issue immediately enforceable curtailment orders against post-1914 water rights holders. Before the new regulations, water diverters were entitled to an evidentiary hearing before any curtailment order could be enforced. Now, the curtailment order can be legally enforced without a prior hearing — and diverters who refuse to comply could face substantial penalties — an issue the California Farm Bureau found troubling. "We have some due process concerns with that," said Chris Scheuring, a representative of the legal services division of the California Farm Bureau….The regulations went into effect on Monday and will be in place for 270 days….While large and potentially historical cutbacks are looming in the near future, the far-sighted solution is simple: more storage, said Scheuring.

OID suggests selling water to outsiders to subsidize district costs [Modesto Bee]
The Oakdale Irrigation District hasn’t raised its water rates in 30 years, and it was obvious Tuesday that OID’s directors resent a state law requiring them to charge farmers more to irrigate….Virtually every other California irrigation district has complied with the Water Conservation Act of 2009, which requires farmers to pay for water based on how much they use. But instead of complying with the statewide effort to save water, OID is suing the state government. It doesn’t think it is fair for lawmakers to require OID and its farmers to pay for the equipment needed to meter how much water each farmer receives….Rather than charging farmers to install the necessary metering equipment, the district proposes covering much of the expense by selling OID water to out-of-county buyers.

Fresno County falls behind Tulare County as state's king of agriculture [Fresno Bee]
Fresno County was dethroned as California's leading agricultural producer in 2013 despite the rise of almonds as the county's second billion-dollar crop. The ongoing drought contributed to declines in crop values. Last year, Fresno County's overall gross value fell 2.2% to $6.4 billion. In 2012, it dropped 3% to $6.5 billion. The county slips to No. 2 behind dairy rich Tulare County, whose agriculture value jumped to a record $7.8 billion on robust dairy prices. Fresno County Agricultural Commissioner Les Wright said the drought -- one of the worst in state history -- has pinched the production of several westside field crops including cotton, corn silage and barley….Wright warned supervisors that next year's report may be even more sobering. In the past, west Fresno County farmers have been hit hardest by shortages of water. But this year, the drought is punishing growers on both the west and east sides.

Editorial: Growing the local economy [Santa Maria Times]
Despite being mired in a drought, last year turned out to be a pretty good one for local agriculture, whose total value for 2013 topped $1 billion for the eighth consecutive year. That accomplishment takes on new meaning when you consider that, in 2013, Mother Nature was already fully flexing her no-rain muscle….Despite the relatively good year in terms of overall value, there are warning signs for local agriculture, the most worrisome sign being the lack of water, and how long that situation may exist. Water planning will take on exponentially greater significance, as long as Mother Nature insists on holding back on the rain.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

Ag Today Tuesday, July 15, 2014


Judge approves water transfers [Stockton Record]
A federal judge has cleared the way for water transfers from Northern California to the thirsty south San Joaquin Valley, overruling environmentalists who argued the transfers would harm threatened fish. U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill found that the case boiled down to a disagreement between fish experts on both sides, and concluded that the court must defer to the opinion of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the environmentalists. A Fish and Wildlife spokesman said Monday that while smelt may indeed be in the Delta while the water is pumped south, the fish during the summertime are usually far from the export pumps near Tracy and are unlikely to be killed by those pumps.

Westlands buying water from Placer County [Hanford Sentinel]
The struggle to find additional irrigation water for Kings County’s parched Westside was on full display Monday as the comment period closed on a proposed 35,000 acre-feet water transfer from Placer County Water Agency to thirsty Westlands Water District, 80,000 acres of which are in Kings County….The water will make its way down the American River into Folsom Lake, then through the delta and a series of canals to Westlands. It could be used immediately on crops, or it might be stored in San Luis Reservoir…. Westlands is paying Placer County $325 an acre-foot for the transfer, according to Einar Maisch, director of strategic affairs for Placer County Water Agency….The retail cost to Westside growers is estimated to be between $800-$1,100 an acre-foot.

IID working on five-year strategic plan [Imperial Valley Press]
The Imperial Irrigation District is in the process of drafting a five-year strategic plan that formalizes the Salton Sea restoration and renewable energy initiative as its signature organizational goal.…The outline presented to the board of directors recently has five broad goals: water rights and reoperations, balancing authority optimization, repositioning of the organization, “the initiative and the enterprise” and communicating the IID agenda….The IID is racing against the clock to fulfill its obligations under the Quantification Settlement Agreement, the 2003 agreement that started the transfer of water from the Imperial Valley to San Diego and the Coachella Valley. The QSA requires a cohesive water conservation effort on the IID’s water delivery canals and on the farmers’ fields. The district is also required to stop fallowing land in 2017 as a means to make water available for the transfer. It will also stop delivering water into the Salton Sea that year as a means to offset the reduced inflows caused by the transfer.

Congressmen demand information about Petaluma slaughterhouse [Santa Rosa Press Democrat]
Six months after federal regulators closed a Petaluma slaughterhouse and initiated a nationwide beef recall, two North Bay congressmen are calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture for answers about the still-ongoing investigations. “Six months has been ample time,” Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, said Monday of the probes into Rancho Feeding Corp. “They should have been able to give us information, and they haven’t.” Rep. Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, said USDA officials “are using pending investigations as a convenient foil for complete secrecy and radio silence. … And that is simply not acceptable.”…An unknown number of local ranchers had meat from Rancho deemed unfit for sale. Of those, Bill Niman and Nicolette Hahn Niman of BN Ranch in Bolinas have more than $300,000 of affected meat in frozen storage. The Nimans still are awaiting answers on what went wrong at Rancho in the hopes they can prove to regulators that their beef remains safe to eat.

Supreme Court is asked to review Calif. ban on force-feeding birds [Sacramento Bee]
California’s ban on force-feeding ducks and geese to produce foie gras is on the Supreme Court’s summer menu….Thirteen states _ including South Carolina, Missouri, Kansas and Georgia _ are urging the court to review California’s prohibition. Serious constitutional principles are on the line, they and other critics of the law say. “The Supreme Court should take the case because it raises an issue of extraordinary national importance in terms of whether one state, like California, can dictate the farming methods to be used by farmers in other states,” attorney Michael Tenenbaum said in an email interview Monday.…Based in Santa Monica, Calif., Tenenbaum is representing opponents of the state’s law. These include a California restaurant company, a New York state foie gras producer and a Canadian organization of duck and goose farmers. The 13 states filed a separate brief making similar arguments.

Farm adviser additions explored [Stockton Record]
Public comment is being sought on what University of California Cooperative Extension posts - farming, nutrition and family life experts who would share their knowledge and conduct research in service to the public and California agriculture - most urgently need to be filled. Extension officials from throughout the state have proposed more than 120 such experts be enlisted. The comment period ends Monday….Bruce Blodgett, executive manager of San Joaquin Farm Bureau, said extension advisers have kept area farmers appraised of the best practices for the past century. "It's still critical to this day," he said. "(They supply) the latest knowledge, latest technology in anything from how to grow the crop to how to be more efficient with water, you name it."

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.