Friday, August 15, 2014

Ag Today Wednesday, August 6, 2014


Jerry Brown presses case on $6 billion water bond [Sacramento Bee]
Gov. Jerry Brown, pressing his case Tuesday for a smaller water bond on the November ballot, criticized the existing, $11.1 billion bond as “pork-laden” and “with a price tag beyond what’s reasonable or affordable.” Brown has been pushing for a $6 billion bond since June, with $2 billion of that amount for dams and other water storage projects….Brown’s letter serves as a marker of the governor’s position ahead of water bond talks in the Legislature this month….There are sharp disagreements about how much money to allocate for dams and other storage and about how to address the Delta. Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, D-San Diego, said in a written statement that a $6 billion bond “would ultimately be too small to meet the state’s dire needs.”

Feds cut off irrigation to some Klamath Project farms [Eureka Times-Standard/Associated Press]
In a decision similar to last week's cessation of releases to the lower Klamath and Trinity rivers, water is being cut off to about one-third of the farms on a federal irrigation project in the drought-parched Klamath Basin of Oregon and California. A July 31 letter from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation to irrigation districts says that the flows into the Klamath Reclamation Project's primary reservoir have been below pre-season forecasts from the Natural Resources Conservation Service, forcing a reduction in releases to districts with junior claims on water in order to meet minimum water levels for endangered fish….Greg Addington of the Klamath Water Users Association said Tuesday that the most recent cutoff means no more water for 50,000 acres of the project. Most of those farms produce hay, and losing irrigation will mean they lose up to half their crop for the year, he said.

U.S. Forest Service running out of money to fight fires [Associated Press]
The U.S. Forest Service will soon have to scale back some projects designed to help prevent wildfires so that it can meet the expenses of fighting this summer's round of fires. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said Tuesday that about $400 million to $500 million in projects will have to be put on hold in what has become a routine exercise toward the end of the fiscal year. He predicted that the money set aside strictly for firefighting will run out by the end of August….Lawmakers from both parties generally agree the current funding model is broken. They say it's self-defeating to curtail activities designed to prevent forest fires, such as thinning overgrown forests and clearing underbrush, to cover the full costs of fighting blazes that have become more destructive over the past decade. But there is disagreement about how to fix the problem.

State to consider emergency protection for tricolored blackbird [Los Angeles Times]
The California Fish and Game Commission on Wednesday will consider an emergency listing of the tricolored blackbird as a threatened or endangered species in response to a statewide survey showing its population has plummeted 44% since 2011….As part of an effort to save the species, Audubon California and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service are leading a program that pays dairy farmers to delay harvesting their silage crops through the nesting season. “Without the cooperation and commitment of farmers,” Brigid McCormack, executive director of Audubon California, said in a prepared statement, “this bird would be even closer to extinction." So far, however, that program has failed to stem the decline. Listing would help provide funding for the development and implementation of additional new strategies for stabilizing at-risk colonies.

Wildlife refuges phasing out GMO crops, pesticides [Associated Press]
National wildlife refuges around the country are phasing out genetically modified crops and a class of pesticides related to nicotine in programs meant to provide food for wildlife. A July 17 letter from James W. Kurth, chief of the national refuge system, makes no specific mention of any concerns that the pesticides or the crops pose risks to wildlife or pollinators, such as bees and butterflies. It just says they don't fit refuge objectives, such as promoting natural ecosystems. "We make this decision based on a precautionary approach to our wildlife management practices, and not on agricultural practices," he wrote.

Commentary: Pesticides are critical to providing a safe, reliable food supply [Sacramento Bee]
…Many Californians think of pesticides as something only farmers use. They don’t realize that pesticides touch many other areas in their lives. We all reap the benefits of pesticides. They are part of the complex processes required to deliver safe food, water and health care, yet some consumers are reluctant to accept the risks required to create those benefits. When something seems foreign to us and we don’t understand its benefits, it becomes vulnerable to attack by seemingly well-meaning people and organizations….Pesticides are chemical compounds that are critical to providing a safe, reliable food supply, maintaining public health, and managing open spaces and urban landscaping. There are no current replacements that effectively deliver these services on a wide scale. So society will continue to use them….Pesticides are among the most regulated item in commerce in California. We are proud to have the most protective pesticide regulations in the world. But the regulatory system requires, indeed depends on, painstaking scientific research. California law allows my department – the Department of Pesticide Regulation – to act based only on science, not on current trends, opinion or fear.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

Ag Today Tuesday, August 5, 2014


Feds face backlash trying to regulate wetlands that often aren’t wet [McClatchy News Service]
When is a ditch just a ditch? And when is a plot of woodland without a stitch of visible water actually a “water of the U.S.”? For federal officials working on contentious regulations to clarify what the 42-year-old Clean Water Act really means, the debate is more than a simple is-the-ditch-half-full-or-half-empty exercise. It’s become a flash point in the debate between environmental regulators and property owners, with farmers particularly aiming to get the federal government to pull the so-called “Waters of the U.S.” rule….The EPA projects that the new rule would result in a 3 percent increase in jurisdiction, a projection Shinn calls laughable; the American Farm Bureau says the methods the EPA used to analyze the issue were too limiting, seriously undercounting the number of waters that could become covered….The Farm Bureau is pushing hard against the rule.

A modern-day Dust Bowl [Yahoo News]
Bob Taylor was barely 2 years old when his parents packed as many belongings as they could into their rickety old car and headed west from New Mexico toward California….But the most important testimony of that era may rest with Taylor and other children of the Dust Bowl, the last generation of Americans who understand in a way many never will the quiet danger of a sustained drought and how devastating it can be to the land, its industry and people. It’s those stories he heard as a child that Taylor has been thinking about lately as he’s driven the back roads of Kern County, the heart of California’s central farming valley, where his family resettled and he’s spent his entire life working in agriculture…But the drought’s biggest victim could be California’s Central Valley, the source of fully half the nation’s fruits and vegetables, where panicked farmers are taking extraordinary steps to survive a drought that could drive them out of business.

Stockton-based water agency wins damage suit against feds [Fresno Bee]
A federal appeals court has delivered a big victory to a small San Joaquin Valley water district….Judges concluded that the government owes additional damages for the Bureau of Reclamation’s failure to deliver enough water to the Stockton-based Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District….The ruling issued Friday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a trial judge, who had rejected the water district’s claims for “expectancy” damages. In this case, these cover things like damages to farmers and the local groundwater aquifer resulting from the shortfalls in surface water deliveries….The ruling resonates among other California irrigation districts, which between drought and enhanced environmental protections have been facing dry spells of their own.

Opinion: Drought ramps up pressure on Legislature to write water bond [Sacramento Bee]
The water squeeze is on….Having procrastinated for years, politicians now may have no more than a week to fashion a new water bond for the Nov. 4 ballot to replace one that many fear is doomed because of its size – $11.1 billion – and obviously gratuitous pork. Very soon, officials must begin printing ballots and other election material so they can be distributed to overseas voters, including troops in Afghanistan….The issue’s politics are complex.

Editorial: California needs to get a grip on its groundwater [Los Angeles Times]
…The fight over groundwater is so contentious that competing interests have for decades resisted any attempt to regulate it. Gov. Jerry Brown first recommended that lawmakers pass measures managing groundwater back in the 1970s, but to no avail….State Sen. Fran Pavley (D-Agoura Hills) and Assemblyman Roger Dickinson (D-Sacramento) each have authored bills that would take modest but crucial steps toward providing a framework for local management of groundwater supplies. Lawmakers should consider their work — which may emerge this week in a unified bill — a priority for California. The need for groundwater management extends to all parts of the state, but not equally….Legislation should take these differences into account.

2G Roses closes as Pajaro Valley industry withers [Santa Cruz Sentinel]
A 1995 flood that inundated its San Juan Road greenhouses and caused $1 million in damage didn't kill 2G Roses. Nor did a 1991 free trade pact that brought tough competition, tightened margins and drove many other growers out of business. But Eugene Tsuji and sister Arlene, who ran the company started 41 years ago by their parents, struggled to recover from the recession. A lawsuit filed by an employee alleging sexual harassment by another worker was the last straw….The closing makes California Pajarosa, across the Pajaro River in Santa Cruz County, the lone survivor of a once flourishing Pajaro Valley rose industry….Statewide, the number of cut rose producers dropped from more than 150 in 1991 to 25 in 2013, according to Kasey Cronquist, chief executive officer of the California Cut Flower Commission. Ninety-eight percent of roses sold in the United States are imported.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.

Ag Today Monday, August 4, 2014


Water bond leads agenda as California lawmakers return for final month [Sacramento Bee]
Looking ahead to the crush of down-to-the-wire bills that will consume their August, California lawmakers have a unified message: It’s all about the water bond. Legislators return from summer recess today to a mountain of unfinished business. They have until the end of the month to decide whether to pass bills and send them to Gov. Jerry Brown. But to a person, every California lawmaker asked about the frenzied final stretch pointed to the agenda-crowning need to place a new water bond before voters this year. A widely reviled $11.1 billion measure passed in 2009 has been forsaken by most Democrats. With a vicious drought still withering the state, members of both parties feel the pressure to find a viable alternative.

California lawmakers struggle to reach drought relief deal [Associated Press]
Prospects for a drought relief bill to help California farmers appear as likely as the state being deluged by three straight days of rain. Key lawmakers and staff are working to resolve differences in two bills that separately passed the House and Senate this year. The lawmakers won’t say where progress has occurred or what roadblocks remain, but time is running out for the current congressional session….Paul Wenger, president of the California Farm Bureau Federation, said lawmakers need to get something done before next year’s planting season. “We have told both sides to work together, realizing neither is going to get exactly what they want, but California will suffer if they don’t get something done,” Wenger said.

Public comment period for Delta tunnels ends [Stockton Record]
…Officials on Friday said they are beginning the process of wading through 10,000 to 11,000 public comments on the governor's twin tunnels plan for the Delta.…The letters have not been immediately made public, but some have been posted by an environmental group, and The Record requested copies of other letters this week from more than two dozen interested parties. While a comprehensive review isn't yet possible, the letters range from short and passionate entreaties from Delta residents who consider the water diversion a threat to their way of life, to long and technical missives about the benefits and shortcomings of the $25 billion plan. About 8,000 of the comments are from letters of various kinds, said Brian "BG" Heiland, a supervising engineer with the state Department of Water Resources. A team of consultants is processing the comments now, and then various experts who helped write the plan will begin the enormous task of responding.

Study: Program harms area farmers [Marysville Appeal-Democrat]
Building restrictions from the National Flood Insurance Program have stymied the ability of Sutter County farmers to expand or improve their operations, according to a recent government study. The Government Accountability Office study found the flood insurance program managed by FEMA requires farmers to either elevate new or significantly improved structures as high as 15 feet or create large openings in the structure that would expose agricultural products to pests and pathogens…."It's clear right off the bat that those rules don't work for agriculture structures. It's cost-prohibitive," said James Gallagher, Sutter County supervisor.…Now, county supervisors, particularly Gallagher and Stan Cleveland, who have been leading the charge for NFIP reform, hope the report can be a springboard to change before the problem gets worse.

Sierra Club: Marin coastal plan paves way for housing [Marin Independent Journal]
Contending that Marin County's coastal policies pave the way for development by allowing farmers to build homes for their children, the Sierra Club has sued the California Coastal Commission, saying new regulations covering West Marin weaken protection of the state's entire coast. A top state coastal lawyer rejected the Sierra Club's allegations, saying the state coastal panel has done nothing amiss….Coastal commission staffers who help give the agency a tough watchdog reputation rebutted criticism by environmental activists earlier this year. State coastal planners defended farm family housing, saying allowing a tightly limited program would preserve agricultural use of large ranches by accommodating a new generation, and curb pressure to sell off 60-acre lots.

Cow theft bill brings stronger penalties [Eureka Times-Standard]
Despite the recent passage of stiffer punishments for cattle rustlers statewide, livestock theft is still alive and kicking in Humboldt County, according to officials. John Suther, a special investigator with the state's Bureau of Livestock Identification said there have been around three or four cases of stolen cattle in Humboldt County in the last three years….With cases like this and others across the state, Gov. Jerry Brown signed Assembly Bill 1772 into law on July 16, and now those convicted of livestock theft will be barred from holding a registered brand in California for five years, according to Suther….Suther said he hopes the bill will keep thieves from taking the cattle, He added that about 20 percent of reported stolen cattle are ever found and returned.

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.


Ag Today Friday, August 1, 2014




Federal agency determines Merced County groundwater sale has ‘no significant impact’ [Merced Sun-Star]
The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation on Thursday approved the environmental report for a multimillion-dollar proposal to allow the transfer and sale of Merced County groundwater to buyers in Stanislaus County. The federal agency issued a “Finding of No Significant Impact” report, which occurs when an environmental analysis determines that a project has no major impacts on the quality of the environment.…According to the proposal, two Merced County landowners will pump up to 13,000 acre-feet of groundwater per year to sell to the Del Puerto Water District and the Patterson Irrigation District over the next two years….Anthea Hansen, general manager of the Del Puerto Water District, said the project was scaled back because of concerns from local growers that pumping groundwater and moving it out of Merced County, especially during a drought year, would reduce the supply of nearby wells….Despite the monitoring plan and assurance that pumping won’t exceed historic amounts, county Farm Bureau Executive Director Amanda Carvajal said the water shortage is getting more critical each day.

Commentary: Groundwater can’t be regulated without increasing surface supplies [Sacramento Bee]
…The governor, legislators and others are calling for potentially far-reaching changes in the use and management of groundwater – new fees, new requirements and new bureaucracy to administer it all. Protecting California’s groundwater is vitally important for everyone. However, we cannot legislate new approaches to groundwater management in isolation; the surface supply shortages driving the overdraft of groundwater supplies must also be addressed if we are to successfully protect and restore our precious groundwater basins….Recent studies, including one underway by the Nature Conservancy, indicate that increased surface storage capacity, together with conveyance improvements in the Delta, will provide the greatest benefits for groundwater. These investments will help to both restore stressed groundwater basins and capture abundant surface flows when they are available.

$11M deal struck to conserve Colorado River basin [Associated Press]
Water providers from four western states and the federal government announced an $11 million agreement Thursday to fund projects meant to counteract critically low water levels in the Colorado River basin, which supplies water to about 40 million people in seven states. The Interior Department said Thursday that local water providers in Arizona, California, Nevada and Colorado will take part in the deal. It aims to create several small pilot programs in 2015 and 2016 that would provide incentives and compensation for conservation by cities, farmers and industry, according to a statement announcing the agreement. The programs that work best can then be expanded, extended, or both.

Appeals court approves bond sale for high-speed rail [Fresno Bee]
A state appellate court has cleared the way for the sale of bonds for California's controversial high-speed rail project, overturning a lower-court ruling. But in making its ruling late Thursday afternoon, the 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento said it sees other looming legal questions for high-speed rail -- most raised in lawsuits by Kings County plaintiffs. Appellate Justices Vance W. Raye, Ronald B. Robie and M. Kathleen Butz ordered Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Michael Kenny to OK the issuance of bonds from Proposition 1A, the $9.9 billion high-speed rail bond measure approved by California voters in 2008.…The justices also ordered Kenny to vacate his November ruling in one part of a lawsuit filed by Kings County farmer John Tos, Hanford resident Aaron Fukuda and the Kings County Board of Supervisors that the rail authority's funding plan failed to comply with Prop. 1A requirements.

USDA announces 1st update to poultry inspection rules since 1957 [Sacramento Bee]
The U.S. Department of Agriculture announced on Thursday the first new regulations for poultry inspection since 1957. The rules, which were finalized Thursday, require plants to conduct their own testing and sampling of birds for the first time for food-borne pathogens such as campylobacter and salmonella, at least twice during the production process. The USDA will continue to conduct its own tests as well. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the changes would result in 5,000 fewer food-borne illnesses connected to poultry products every year.

Tears, hugs, shucking at Drakes Bay Oyster Co.'s final day open to public [San Francisco Chronicle]
The tears flowed like a cool Pacific current Thursday in West Marin as hundreds gathered to bid a final shuck to a century-old oyster farm on Drakes Estero. After years of unsuccessful wrangling with the federal government, Drakes Bay Oyster Co. closed its doors to the public Thursday afternoon after an emotional oyster toast, a lone bagpiper's rendition of "Auld Lang Syne" and plenty of hugs. "We wrote letters, we called people, we did what we could. But it wasn't enough to save this place," said Hugo Phillips, a retired engineer from San Rafael who's been buying Drakes Bay oysters for 40 years. "It's a very sad day. They're good people. I just wanted to see them off."

Ag Today is distributed by the CFBF Communications/News Division to county Farm Bureaus, CFBF directors and CFBF staff, for information purposes; stories may not be republished without permission. Some story links may require site registration. To be removed from this mailing list, reply to this message and please provide your name and e-mail address. For more information about Ag Today, contact 916-561-5550 or news@cfbf.com.